IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-pceps-tls13-02

julien.meuric@orange.com Tue, 16 May 2023 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BC7C1524DE for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 May 2023 09:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Evr6l07rgdtW for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 May 2023 09:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70E04C151988 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 May 2023 09:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr03.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.67]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr24.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4QLLf254jzz1yM7 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 May 2023 18:04:26 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1684253066; bh=cZkZMCOPbPbeyRw/7bqlyGo+Z9jPYbkRZBIPadGBoJo=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; b=pXr96qwjiYUR07OKRMWJIlK+hbzuR4AFfFpCPmy1Z66dWqVS28kc+Zi3iBvc/hce0 +Q0DcbIRCAqsaSXZJZG9Kvz9Jfm7S3gaPtDlS0FopstYuqhe7Id3uiNaGxE8lFieRJ Su8FmpaDPoW0EhQoQCOuUeIG4WpmFY+5MFnYK8yMDjEtbLJVE1sEZteyQKrGaQ7R50 2icbOFJgNiDHCvGjYtOBgExlkklKLjrecF4Cocnn+GVFpzW3+5Of0gZhTvVs+C+xUg WycdHMfWexQgC2UvlbcbNbEydcdCNN5Yl5HYVSLRYllHQrvABk7UiceNAcPDQ6VVnA sGVSZ+3RFBkDw==
Message-ID: <18f339b2-e784-4332-d130-3cd917ff8959@orange.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 18:04:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Content-Language: en-US, fr
To: pce@ietf.org
References: <22429_1679910536_64216688_22429_382_1_7702537a-c688-7208-14a3-c66003155ce2@orange.com>
From: julien.meuric@orange.com
Organization: Orange
In-Reply-To: <22429_1679910536_64216688_22429_382_1_7702537a-c688-7208-14a3-c66003155ce2@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms080908030402000706010600"
X-Originating-IP: [10.115.27.51]
X-ClientProxiedBy: OPE16NORMBX401.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.115.26.14) To OPE16NORMBX407.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.115.27.16)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/QcXccKpVuVrJylmf7AUChZvBY54>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-pceps-tls13-02
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 16:04:32 -0000

Hi all,

Since there's no objection, we can confirm the result that showed a 
clear support for adoption during Yokohama the meeting. The I-D is 
adopted as a PCE work item.

@Authors: You know the drill, please submit the document as 
draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-00.

Thanks,

Julien


On 27/03/2023 11:48, julien.meuric@orange.com wrote:
> Dear WG,
>
> During the PCE session today, there was clear support behind the PCEPS
> updates I-D. Let's take it to the next level: do you consider that
> draft-dhody-pce-pceps-tls13-02 should be adopted as a PCE WG item?
>
> Please, share your answer and any detailed feedback using the PCE
> mailing list.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Julien
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email