IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02

Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es> Wed, 14 January 2015 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34AF1B2C66 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:45:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XmI_yCUPxWeE for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:45:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from villa.puc.rediris.es (villa.puc.rediris.es [IPv6:2001:720:418:ca00::7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A92F41B2C65 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:45:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [2001:40b0:7c22:6020:1cd3:289c:2f1c:7f12] (helo=leo) by villa.puc.rediris.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>) id 1YBMNr-0000Pe-UH for pce@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:45:13 +0100
Received: from [84.88.61.50] (unknown [84.88.61.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1A2C1FC56 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:45:08 +0100 (CET)
X-Envelope-From: ramon.casellas@cttc.es
Message-ID: <54B656BC.5020909@cttc.es>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:45:00 +0100
From: Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pce@ietf.org
References: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <30282_1421063031_54B3B377_30282_3283_1_54B3B377.3060306@orange.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure
X-Spamina-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Spamina-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-1.0 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.0521] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: orange.com]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/RK2KI7vQXkpAGN1xZbIsgeusOWc>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:45:22 -0000

El 12/01/2015 a las 12:43, julien.meuric@orange.com escribió:
> Dear PCE WG,
>
> Following our previous discussions on IRO within PCEP, do you agree 
> with the adoption of draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-02 as a PCE WG I-D? 
> Please share your comments using the mailing list, justifying as much 
> as possible in case you are opposed. 
All,

Imho it can be adopted. It clarifies RFC5440 to state that IRO is 
ordered and the role of L bit. Being involved in the domain sequence 
draft that triggered this, and contributed to the survey, I am ok with 
the outcome. That said, and for completeness, I remember someone 
(Adrian?) mentioned in the past that not assuming ordering in IRO could 
mean more flexibility to the PCE. Maybe this can be addressed in the future?

thanks
Ramon

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email