[Pce] Pcep-ls update
Young Lee <younglee.tx@gmail.com> Tue, 22 October 2019 11:20 UTC
Return-Path: <younglee.tx@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4263120820 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 04:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-QgzTjqoQhi for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 04:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd36.google.com (mail-io1-xd36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CEA71201E3 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 04:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd36.google.com with SMTP id c25so19855749iot.12 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 04:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=c4V6T9gCa+JiqLdwjaeKjhCR/iVTotaY5lN2dRNdJ14=; b=YM9dHO2qmNQAXkwu1SmgHhk8S9Wmlgq8OIWh/gjXlpHH2tjUuVUiSLkq0rD4nISvuy A04psDBX5jn4WosemTzOVJbMT/+gaGezYxFi4b0rOclI1Mpi0Rh9vJ+CjKo1RBvqV5wH 9gyVP+IyuIRhQG00ljae5wcewrsEMqSULBIIDWl3Y+OyDSNz/j6hoH612C/Fta1ZSvyN N/dZgYaheYva2LXhyNSX5cmtS4s+MV4TZdG2+XZQwUKThtDOb0SJiWIOTezPMmVZ7ZfQ KHOzlHNLkvpknxy7JR1q3ZrGr5EMc6gvt8PEXO1LyTrO1gIkk1nKHMRwqxDlcf1SQRqO HRlw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=c4V6T9gCa+JiqLdwjaeKjhCR/iVTotaY5lN2dRNdJ14=; b=Tj7Ezxr+f30bmfBI6KBLI48rEcSadiBG/VCX6YuUD1CcjC9fpuhfBZ4T9fJzq/Mipj M7qVeQbzo8QFc9rUu6v7Lg7XjHfMqSzCw/dP7duOiO76Ha/uWCCbgqoaUUe4Ke2v69rs DNKN48Zochet8LcqMYBkourx1DkSTomln/zVDwlQcvkTXS6bM5x50Z99looOS7Qbafzd aYZDtXynDDW6zBjk2vd2QIeXkmwLm6tv3SQsGUiHXtHV5bNyr+seo3oEF+G0EW6utn6b 2MRpTI0IVzuJrPKDYhc3EluSKEMZTpn6M8yyPAS83YrWdIkMC5TNId0mY5KbRoDlc8rK d7KA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXlMC7OVbuI+eHpgGfb5JHrt1OOLk3r8rr2e18MZuoPBXnicUZk gkAnB5UggObukiOcvdFG06CWpkIjY7F/HqxabSe2Qw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz/sD4ORW2dysAwcEmbvQkYTP8B+XsBGZdmzNLnf7Gl+lMA1HXFyT/KO925cBBM9q6B1NLbgH9drLzuggkEmkk=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:c809:: with SMTP id y9mr758326iof.232.1571743250512; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 04:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Young Lee <younglee.tx@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 20:20:39 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGHSPWPd+A9LC8i4beAqV5ZbbsA4krnqA6q49OH-v-+xsk+QTw@mail.gmail.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001ffe5a05957dfed1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/Rl0Y-8ge6F__0HEtyujFuVUNdH4>
Subject: [Pce] Pcep-ls update
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:20:53 -0000
Hi WG, We have made an update to the PCEP-LS document. The main change is with respect to the IANA registry for PCEP-LS sub-TLVs. We are following the same approach as PCEP flowspec and have divided the registry in such a way that the codepoint defined for BGP-LS can be reused in PCEP-LS. This document would define any new PCEP-LS specific sub-TLV only. This does simplify the document considerably. Thanks! Young (on behalf of authors)
- [Pce] Pcep-ls update Young Lee