IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor

Cheng Li <c.l@huawei.com> Mon, 24 July 2023 09:55 UTC

Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337C6C14CE40 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 02:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id No6rnWmniJry for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 02:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA3ABC151982 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 02:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4R8b504CS8z6GD5H for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 17:50:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from canpemm100006.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.17) by lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:54:58 +0100
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.56) by canpemm100006.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 17:54:56 +0800
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) by dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.027; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 17:54:56 +0800
From: Cheng Li <c.l@huawei.com>
To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor
Thread-Index: AQHZo0uW6B6Zlcsj3UCLPr598vrw9a+9kWsAgANMN6A=
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 09:54:56 +0000
Message-ID: <1bf4942f9d11490ab08c8d874c453c27@huawei.com>
References: <3d5b8f67-36ae-2910-619b-dd5c5a50168c@orange.com> <aff54288-5879-135f-016c-19d47675121d@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <aff54288-5879-135f-016c-19d47675121d@orange.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.82.107.136]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/S-JdVMKlsELsdzTUC2jNFhBcem8>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 09:55:07 -0000

Hi Julien & Dhruv,

Many thanks for your work, we have uploaded the 00 revision draft.
Will address the comments in 01 very soon, and I think we may not receive too many comments. The proposed update will be shared in Github, and send to the ML before submitting.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor/


There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-00.html

Thanks,
Li Cheng



-----Original Message-----
From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of julien.meuric@orange.com
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 9:03 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor

Hi PCE WG,

We have clear support to adopt this work as a WG item. Thank you, all.

@Authors: Please submit the I-D as draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-00
when the submission tool reopens (starting next Saturday).

Cheers,

Dhruv & Julien


On 20/06/2023 09:46, Julien Meuric wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It has been a while since draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor started 
> to document how to extend the scope of RFC 7470. It is now time to 
> consider its adoption by the WG.
> Do you think draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-16 [1] is ready to 
> become a PCE work item? Please express your support and/or concerns 
> using the mailing list.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dhruv & Julien
>
>
> [1] 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email