[Pce] Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-14: (with DISCUSS)
Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 11 April 2019 11:27 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE141201C7; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 04:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions@ietf.org, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, pce-chairs@ietf.org, julien.meuric@orange.com, pce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.95.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <155498207568.12802.3705482162496355990.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 04:27:55 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/S9yusKX0E5GWnoQ4OQrpdVMAbjM>
Subject: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-14: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:28:02 -0000
Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-14: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, thanks for this document. I have a discuss point that shouldn't be difficult to resolve: Why do you define a flag field in the GMPLS-CAPABILITY TLV if you don't have any flag? I guess the easy answer is that there might be some in the future. If so, I tend to think that creating a registry for that field would be a good thing to do now. -m
- [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-ietf-pc… Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker
- Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-iet… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-iet… Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)