IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-14: (with DISCUSS)

"Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com> Thu, 11 April 2019 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1B7120198; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pzv9ENB6YG1f; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr20137.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.2.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF1C71206E4; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=VG7uvTf4N+FHwl9636v5CLIMamr/w8f9BvDu6jUTe8o=; b=FgxhKWB9NduE3259ahr/qVTE7Ew4dRmwnfLk3VEy3+8kmNsTILa85QR/3doT6YIDh3BicAJ3z1V42oA7ovy7lhnpbZLmY/pT9WNUZItBWk0SFq/Ec/erbXZq5VaPj88lJxKJTfHHjztfq9um5j02jAYqqj0pCZIeE/U4bABEAvs=
Received: from DB7PR07MB4999.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.177.193.88) by DB7PR07MB4732.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.135.136.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1792.10; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 20:59:30 +0000
Received: from DB7PR07MB4999.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ac3e:c6bf:1d97:41a1]) by DB7PR07MB4999.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ac3e:c6bf:1d97:41a1%2]) with mapi id 15.20.1792.009; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 20:59:25 +0000
From: "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions@ietf.org>
CC: 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>, 'Julien Meuric' <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-14: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHU8KlxzRMVzm0OKU+NdCj0zEhNuQ==
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 20:59:25 +0000
Message-ID: <6f7c6b53-ea84-0662-95ad-5e9a7c3f8d79@nokia.com>
References: <155498207568.12802.3705482162496355990.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <045201d4f05e$3cddfc00$b699f400$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <045201d4f05e$3cddfc00$b699f400$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [131.228.2.20]
user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
x-clientproxiedby: PR2PR09CA0020.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:101:16::32) To DB7PR07MB4999.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:5d::24)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=martin.vigoureux@nokia.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7e7de625-97c6-4826-4966-08d6bec09415
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DB7PR07MB4732;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR07MB4732:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB7PR07MB473249CD893A4FFCEA21F1248C2F0@DB7PR07MB4732.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 00046D390F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(396003)(199004)(189003)(13464003)(105586002)(2616005)(486006)(476003)(25786009)(71190400001)(6512007)(99286004)(11346002)(446003)(5660300002)(106356001)(53546011)(6506007)(386003)(97736004)(316002)(31686004)(102836004)(54906003)(110136005)(52116002)(58126008)(76176011)(66066001)(2906002)(6116002)(186003)(65806001)(3846002)(65956001)(26005)(64126003)(6306002)(53936002)(229853002)(7736002)(2501003)(86362001)(305945005)(65826007)(14454004)(4326008)(966005)(36756003)(6246003)(478600001)(6486002)(6436002)(256004)(8676002)(81156014)(81166006)(68736007)(31696002)(8936002)(71200400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB7PR07MB4732; H:DB7PR07MB4999.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: GE/ZMih5RMOTBajWy+IIbxp+0rH248RD7T5wndRh2/HNYiBhwwO5Zfv2zVcdIeoMAV0/ULcT35mxP2fiq2GS6YfQCz618Ay/DoGNFjn0tY4o83eLu5boRXC/C+jjafgcpxHjgxdB0Q2ceT1xWU8UfHszVdYSR+vx0+zSxoKjoKHINx+ZrsBB37itPfYoHB63MqKQpYuVooCXt3MC+riJtP1bY+6FtRm+IcDt42eRIEWTki/W4WJI4WVlzPIzrDnWJVMGsdOf20Of3MbLCScqEd8HJo+qG9ZqcGqp2jEZXDwJ7PVF6ZP7m4EdYu9h6i8tS8zmgtDPURkEg5BhIO0i4fgEaU88VetsHVtLWrlYMIC9YlnCwaHe8XCybgCPJTAHQttKzzHIZ4C+MMQDL49Ew9Cy2hTzEng18qLucOi+c6o=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <2A18B28CB43028478F26034270B45468@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7e7de625-97c6-4826-4966-08d6bec09415
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Apr 2019 20:59:25.0607 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR07MB4732
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ZCnsFga0SnJDsaxek7puGteO800>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-14: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 20:59:36 -0000

Thank you Adrian,

I'm thus clearing this DISCUSS.

-m

Le 2019-04-11 à 14:01, Adrian Farrel a écrit :
> Hi Martin,
> 
> It was a general policy during the development of PCEP to make space for flags in the various objects, and this has turned out to be useful in some cases.
> So, I think the authors were continuing that approach.
> 
> But I agree, if you make the field, you should make the registry.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> Sent: 11 April 2019 12:28
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions@ietf.org; Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>; pce-chairs@ietf.org; julien.meuric@orange.com; pce@ietf.org
> Subject: Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-14: (with DISCUSS)
> 
> Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-14: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hi,
> 
> thanks for this document. I have a discuss point that shouldn't be difficult to resolve:
> 
> Why do you define a flag field in the GMPLS-CAPABILITY TLV if you don't have any flag?
> I guess the easy answer is that there might be some in the future.
> If so, I tend to think that creating a registry for that field would be a good thing to do now.
> 
> -m
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email