[Pce] Regarding Path Profile
Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com> Sun, 09 November 2014 08:14 UTC
Return-Path: <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9A11A1A22 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 00:14:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pvY-NzB_6YPM for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 00:14:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D0681A1A2A for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 00:14:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BLK70278; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 08:14:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEML421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.160) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 08:14:51 +0000
Received: from szxeml556-mbs.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.112]) by szxeml421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.160]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 16:14:43 +0800
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
To: "draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles@tools.ietf.org" <draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding Path Profile
Thread-Index: Ac/79UPxCI5Pjlm4RymeKQX0jV6Lpg==
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 08:14:42 +0000
Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B86614F2C@szxeml556-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.246.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/SjGCMVBzX4UX4gZGzMUiikJnYGA
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] Regarding Path Profile
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 08:15:01 -0000
Hi Authors, All, There is another approach described in [1] which uses the generic mechanism of association group as specified by [2] to achieve the same objectives as path-profile draft [3]. [1] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-association-attr/ [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-minei-pce-association-group-00 [3] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles/ Does the WG see a benefit in having a common approach? Let us discuss this during the WG meeting... We are open to working together in this area based on wishes of the WG. Dhruv
- [Pce] Regarding Path Profile Dhruv Dhody