[Pce] specific comment on draft-ietf-pce-pcecp-interarea-reqs-04.txt

section 4.7 Inter-area Diverse Path computation

o) wrt 6. Security Considerations "IGP areas are administrated by the same 
entity. .."

does the latter ensure uniqueness of the SRLG IDs ?

o) The response message MUST allow indicating the level of diversity of 
   a set of computed loose paths. 

do you mean partial disjointness ? or something equivalent ? 

o) last sentence §3 unclear to me wrt to the next sentence - is it 
referring to a 
diversity of a given wrt to a set of resources but the next sentence 
refers to the
diversity of a given LSP wrt to a set of other LSPs but also their SRLG 
set for inst. ?

thanks,
- d.

JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
22/11/2006 15:51

        To:     pce@ietf.org
        cc: 
        Subject:        [Pce] Working Group Last Call on 
draft-ietf-pce-pcecp-interarea-reqs-04.txt

Dear WG,

A new revision of draft-ietf-pce-pcecp-interarea-reqs (rev -04) has 
been posted that addresses the remaining issues/comments.

This email initiates a Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-pce- 
pcecp-interarea-reqs-04.txt. The last call will end on December 8th 
at noon EST.

Please send your comments to the mailing list.

Thanks.

JP.

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] specific comment on draft-ietf-pce-pcecp-interarea-reqs-04.txt - Section 4.7