Re: [Pce] Final IPR Check for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type

Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk> Wed, 17 May 2017 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <nite@hq.sk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755CD129AFF; Wed, 17 May 2017 12:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hq.sk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JhBsnlVf1Dkn; Wed, 17 May 2017 12:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hq.sk (hq.sk [81.89.59.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B8E512EC22; Wed, 17 May 2017 11:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nitebug.localdomain (chello085216197060.chello.sk [85.216.197.60]) by mail.hq.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 834A3240205; Wed, 17 May 2017 20:59:49 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hq.sk; s=mail; t=1495047589; bh=dAi/bzNo5XjcC74AQQl34IGUoxJyeYY6+4yguHDkq/g=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Oc4oP8iy8qB1P9I2Q7rGOiHAJp54EzBx90FBE7j/L3jT7j5Bp27HbM7+ig7vcIIm0 JBdgBt/SKg+LSKNIPcMbf7vLPM2QE9ZE0PNGvrE9Wg6TnvqADTPxK9HOL2CdwA47s2 bf/S+NBiac/V61G8kERgwG9GYfMf8Ha3ETDfkLMo=
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type@ietf.org>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
References: <df57170c-0d44-d9cd-9221-919292a2161b@orange.com>
From: Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk>
Message-ID: <a8d87e3c-3c40-5ce5-0bf0-b1c4c28cdab9@hq.sk>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 20:59:30 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <df57170c-0d44-d9cd-9221-919292a2161b@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1cESPwmnXoFTmIc4C59GiQFU461FM04Dh"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/VNzaXBNu92hk-emMH2ZbJKk8XDc>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Final IPR Check for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 19:05:33 -0000

On 16/05/17 09:55, Julien Meuric wrote:
> Dear authors,
> 
>  
> 
> Could you please send an email to the PCE mailing list saying whether
> you are aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type
> and, if so, if it has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules?
> (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details.)  If you are not
> aware of any IPR that applies, please reply saying "I am not aware of
> any IPR that applies to this draft".

I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Regards,
Robert