IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-03: (with COMMENT)

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Thu, 04 January 2024 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9D1C14F6A3 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 06:23:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5DOpCZyWXXZ2 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 06:23:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 373DEC14F706 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 06:23:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-428ad74aae4so3059891cf.1 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 06:23:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; t=1704378215; x=1704983015; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=JV2LKWtlxSyzqFm1wvVqXzA2VvoFnBg8QKM2clqk39A=; b=E7hLtp8YIp3qj6RsW5Cw0aAjyFqQyDiQNVNQyk7stgiv9EJwo6iEQPFE3Du4MpQqGU +RcVVDO4+lm7DkUFtuJLGRXTyhuk33SNmhtxSYRNiZlPBhShkXuPMcNwPMhzUWXUOdpa QX86HX1eHCSPj1zMdeG8mSPsWx1y7QtqR/ue0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704378215; x=1704983015; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JV2LKWtlxSyzqFm1wvVqXzA2VvoFnBg8QKM2clqk39A=; b=LmaYv9QjyPEkWVc1D5kY6Vfq4UtY8tkU7RAKvLuY7/U08BtYGNNY3NAPTJfKrT1rvc 0xIqNjW4+myFZY5WAoiRq9FmII9Wg1ymMV5b/T7sckT1dihHzpwwkLmPGlWQ/9+pXuAg SK0UR8C/rN2cN7BBElMbipx01wi306Fpg3fVW6zv9xxNaSVQ6mjuDj8Eu7BgOVheCrAm G8VUwiKkg0Wt7fadEc2UWj61HlOaqIC8ma6z0nmkIaj3wOO+7r1S76kX5noZl1FKcXQD aAs3vSkF+rGQXeuokqYydkrs60HIEytY56q94rzHmDGta5ZU62nzuWqpCSp2A5pH6qg6 tdzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZQ/FgfAoqn4IaQhaUopPIpLjZwtY3lSLOkOLwQBxkUYTR6GF+ XiRBMltlQp6+NMAEUr9wApCOz/RDkhiwMA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHRm0hv+CgXEXPHWtsALJVewXxPJ4Z0cK1mdkbfGXeEXVkbJ4UGbV5Ll7MwWz6RU/oIMdIKIQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1014:b0:429:2dbb:f1d2 with SMTP id d20-20020a05622a101400b004292dbbf1d2mr927607qte.28.1704378215039; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 06:23:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (pool-68-238-162-47.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [68.238.162.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fi8-20020a05622a58c800b004261956e72csm15281253qtb.96.2024.01.04.06.23.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jan 2024 06:23:34 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.15\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn444UCMOKaEFWAhhnuw0w74AWPVExVg0pg3XTyY6xAMZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 09:23:33 -0500
Cc: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13@ietf.org, pce-chairs@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, andrew.stone@nokia.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F285766E-38BB-48A5-BCCD-8B9662EF7A06@sn3rd.com>
References: <170434804500.35593.6503947237738879936@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAB75xn444UCMOKaEFWAhhnuw0w74AWPVExVg0pg3XTyY6xAMZg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/VULbdPza8rleKWvuY8LYJF-QtpM>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 14:23:41 -0000


> On Jan 4, 2024, at 01:12, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Murray, 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 11:30 AM Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-03: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Further to Eric's comment, I'm completely confused by question #4 of the
> shepherd writeup.  While the document claims there are no implementations
> known, the shepherd writeup says there's at least one (and it was easy), and
> makes another "Yes" remark that I don't understand.
> 
> 
> 
> Dhruv: The shepherd writeup mentions this email response on the mailing list - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/dLdcUan2psssBUgzCtXPluEr_ok/ that mentions some implementation experience. When we asked to include that information in the implementation section we did not get a confirmation back. Soo that's that :)
> 
> We could update the implementation section to say - 
> 
> OLD: 
>    At the time of posting the -02 version of this document, there are no
>    known implementations of this mechanism.
> NEW:
>    At the time of posting the -04 version of this document, there are no
>    known implementations of this mechanism. It is believed that one 
>    vendor has implementation, but these plans are too vague to make 
>    any further assertions.
> END
> 
> Thanks! 
> Dhruv

see: https://github.com/ietf-wg-pce/draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13/pull/21

spt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email