Re: [Pce] Ask for time slots in IETF 81

JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com> Tue, 19 July 2011 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <jpv@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C4921F89C1 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.151, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tx5aUhddsZPa for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8FD621F89A1 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jpv@cisco.com; l=928; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1311081599; x=1312291199; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=gJNKPm4CK9gGQn2trUW7Kl3Y9nyhf5a02DHN6hUnPxE=; b=ZRsYq3yrhVk5VMFtJouTIYiRAeWZkD+ToKbo+P20OGP11p9AwY2OenfG hVRlbH3supI+xqvCvyYs82iprv8BObqT1OAOT4x5ojovs86/b8to6jQ6H LaUfQt6A9nd8Ltcfr5xnmxZkUHiab8UMIg0+ok2ZZ+o1J0VUYwlKRGiMC E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EACuDJU5Io8UQ/2dsb2JhbABUp0t3iHykIZ5GhV1fBJJnhQQJi08
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,228,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="43346653"
Received: from bgl-core-1.cisco.com ([72.163.197.16]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Jul 2011 13:19:56 +0000
Received: from xbh-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com (xbh-hkg-412.cisco.com [64.104.123.69]) by bgl-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6JDJuMQ019079; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:19:56 GMT
Received: from xfe-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com ([64.104.123.71]) by xbh-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:19:55 +0800
Received: from [10.60.114.227] ([10.60.114.227]) by xfe-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:19:54 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D404966C41@dfweml503-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:19:50 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0211E8F6-03C2-46E4-9FB4-4FE58F13BC0F@cisco.com>
References: <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D404966C41@dfweml503-mbx.china.huawei.com>
To: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jul 2011 13:19:55.0076 (UTC) FILETIME=[8CB46840:01CC4616]
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Ask for time slots in IETF 81
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:20:03 -0000

Dear Huaimo,

On Jul 11, 2011, at 8:13 PM, Huaimo Chen wrote:

> Hi Julien, JP and Dan, 
> 
>    Could you please allocate three time slots for me as follows if possible?
> 
>      15 minutes for http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2p-path-computation/
> 
>      15 minutes for http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2mp-path/
> 
>      10 minutes for http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-ingress/
> and
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-egress/
> 

Thanks for your email. As explained in the other two emails, these drafts do fall into the same
category of documents that were presented, without any further technical discussion on the 
mailing list. Please start technical thread on the mailing list.

Thanks.

JP and Julien.

> 
> Best Regards,
> Huaimo