[Pce] Fwd: Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12

Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Wed, 24 January 2024 05:59 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP7zK5b7sZRsDz5B08N7PhOVDcZ-7N+s+T_s+VM9q8JiYR+EHA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP7zK5Zsw6Xu-kHQobmv8pkda0gXnZuiTnQ587Lz_PC1Jom_yQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5Zsw6Xu-kHQobmv8pkda0gXnZuiTnQ587Lz_PC1Jom_yQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 11:29:07 +0530
Message-ID: <CAP7zK5Z00CoWkxF5ZFFdc0wd5q+_-jZuhbm81AGM3jUT4KpFOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mike Koldychev (mkoldych)" <mkoldych@cisco.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f0b633060faac4b7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ZKNelFJ0Ov86AKsb55Wf5meU4Ws>
Subject: [Pce] Fwd: Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12
Precedence: list

Hi Mike,

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-13.html#section-6.2

Can the TBD4 SR-POLICY-CAPABILITY be changed to  SRPOLICY-CAPABILITY to
match the naming style for other TLVs?

Thanks!
Dhruv

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Early code point allocation for
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12
To: <pce@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp@ietf.org>, pce-chairs <
pce-chairs@ietf.org>


Hi WG,

We received no objections and thus will be going ahead with the early
 allocation process.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 6:53 PM Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:

> Hi WG,
>
> We have received a request from the authors of
> draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp for an early code point allocation
> for the codepoints listed in -
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12.html#section-6.2
> (TBD1-4)
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12.html#section-6.3
> (TBD6-8)
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12.html#section-6.4
> (TBD9)
>
> Note that there was an earlier allocation request where some codepoints
> were already allocated by IANA -
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/8GtjtxNWeA9MxpySx6J7XZKmlUc/
> Note that the draft is also undergoing a parallel WGLC -
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ert_k7k5iYq3LWbaTc-aMwRRAbs/
>
> RFC 7120 requires one to meet the following criteria to proceed:
>
> b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to
> handling the protocol entities defined by the code points
> (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described
> in an Internet-Draft.
>
> c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if
> there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later
> specifications must be seamlessly interoperable.
>
> If anyone believes that the draft does not meet these criteria or believes
> that early allocation is not appropriate for any other reason, please send
> an email to the PCE mailing list explaining why. If the chairs hear no
> objections by Wednesday, Jan 24th, we will kick off the early allocation
> request.
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv & Julien
>

[Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-… Dhruv Dhody
Re: [Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-i… Dhruv Dhody
[Pce] Fwd: Early code point allocation for draft-… Dhruv Dhody
Re: [Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-i… Mike Koldychev (mkoldych)
[Pce] Fwd: [IANA #1358857] Re: Early code point a… Dhruv Dhody