IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] [dnssd] Solicit feedback to draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-03

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 06 December 2013 06:55 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5D01AE2F4 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 22:55:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M_qDlj7aOkf5 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 22:55:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50F11AE063 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 22:55:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BBB60631; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 06:55:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 06:54:14 +0000
Received: from nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.38) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 06:55:05 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.56]) by nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 14:55:00 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] [dnssd] Solicit feedback to draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-03
Thread-Index: AQHO8lAVEgNY0YZF7UKbGy7pXjS3Nw==
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 06:55:00 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43C692E3@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43C37319@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CEB2CC57.1C3E0%yiya@cisco.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43C595CD@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43C595CD@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.149]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43C692E3nkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [Pce] [dnssd] Solicit feedback to draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-03
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 06:55:16 -0000

2. For TXT record, it seems you split it into multiple records, and put each key/value pair into a different record. This is not necessary.

[Qin]: can multiple records be carried in one DNS message?

In addition, per RFC 6763, the key should not be more than 9 character long, and no space should be used in key, unless it's really necessary.

[Qin]: RFC1464 also defines the format of key/value pair that is carried in TXT record.
Per RFC1464, "less than 9 character long" restriction is not applied to the attribute name. The attribute name is equivalent to key described in RFC6763.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email