IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Ability for a Stateful PCE to request and obtain control of a LSP

"SADANANDAN, VINOD" <vs037t@att.com> Wed, 22 March 2017 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <vs037t@att.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53841294A0 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gV5iwmFIb6F7 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1099B129494 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049459.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049459.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v2MDjIf0022414; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:47:38 -0400
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049459.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 29bqpc8r14-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:47:38 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2MDlbX1011399; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:47:38 -0400
Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2MDlT0m011264 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:47:34 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAF.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAF.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.150]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:47:16 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.2.163]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAF.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.150]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:47:16 -0400
From: "SADANANDAN, VINOD" <vs037t@att.com>
To: "YADLAPALLI, CHAITANYA" <cy098d@att.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
CC: "chaitanyayadlapalli@live.com" <chaitanyayadlapalli@live.com>, "Siva Sivabalan (msiva)" <msiva@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Ability for a Stateful PCE to request and obtain control of a LSP
Thread-Index: AdKhagQMJIp+uDywQb6Pd2es+UrntABqKjXw
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:47:15 +0000
Message-ID: <0C3473C30C81AE4FAE061AC356D5354D58F9CF95@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <CA0B675FC61D874D8A9EB2C7B5CEA787124B75ED@MISOUT7MSGUSRDG.ITServices.sbc.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA0B675FC61D874D8A9EB2C7B5CEA787124B75ED@MISOUT7MSGUSRDG.ITServices.sbc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.65.137.47]
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_0C3473C30C81AE4FAE061AC356D5354D58F9CF95MISOUT7MSGUSRDB_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-03-22_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1702020001 definitions=main-1703220120
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/aCBP7W1-Imu608PI_NAYc_wBJ70>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Ability for a Stateful PCE to request and obtain control of a LSP
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:30:48 -0000

Hi Co-Authors,

This draft looks interesting and I was wondering if you guys will be talking about the use cases pertaining to this ID at the upcoming IETF.

Vinod
AT&T Domain 2.0 Architecture & Design

This communication may contain information that is privileged, or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  Anyone who receives this message in error should notify the sender immediately by telephone or by return e-mail and delete it from his or her computer.



From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of YADLAPALLI, CHAITANYA
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 7:10 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: chaitanyayadlapalli@live.com; Siva Sivabalan (msiva) <msiva@cisco.com>
Subject: [Pce] Ability for a Stateful PCE to request and obtain control of a LSP

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
WG:

We have posted updates to draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request-02.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request-02<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Draghu-2Dpce-2Dlsp-2Dcontrol-2Drequest-2D02&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=4z8xMwvimHxAJ_MMM5cjpg&m=vIAFFqqhVLEyGsufLV145M4uL0anT4BJc8a8Y6fEEIc&s=xlCC9FgqCRz6sY8qjCqqJ5QG-5vbj9NNhB_VkxVANWM&e=>


The following are the changes :
(1) Use case for load sharing when a new instance of virtual PCE is instantiated
(2) Security, Manageability and IANA Considerations
(3) Editorial Changes


We appreciate any feedback/comments.


Thanks,
Chaitanya

Chaitanya Yadlapalli
Domain 2.0 Architecture & Design
732-420-7977
cy098d@att.com<mailto:cy098d@att.com>
[cid:image003.jpg@01D2A2F1.4929F430]

This communication may contain information that is privileged, or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  Anyone who receives this message in error should notify the sender immediately by telephone or by return e-mail and delete it from his or her computer.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email