IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] Re: IPR poll for draft-lee-pce-pcep-ls-optical

"zhaoyangyjy@chinamobile.com" <zhaoyangyjy@chinamobile.com> Wed, 02 September 2026 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <zhaoyangyjy@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: pce@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F2D133B0FE7; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 02:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1788340511; bh=H994FrM25kU0k5TJKUlFMfR4/85sQkWumW91whU3JA4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References; b=LEpeOwMR+rU6Y2aUK+Sn1KcBOSpwzb+Tk9pfrjwwy0BjR7wwKnljb/QUV0Iwk6Qs3 wUymGPUmX9SjFJCF4xuESGs3axaDNI1kaH5a5vhwxhjQ6tgT5o+Sc4r/x8o2wTGIwX i2UvZTGAkth3+YnOGTWcJEZk5cAvIdGe7sYBssT8=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=chinamobile.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VmOCw2CL8BM0; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 02:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.135]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF89133B0FE2; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 02:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chinamobile.com; s=default; l=0; h=from:subject:message-id:to:mime-version; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; b=ZTdMw5iIIzQkSEDM4H5xYelYEd6klYKogRjfHw7q6Gkttku9Q2jxqc2KC9atKgO1e7UnnsEe/JMcF t4tQETgb2v2kCyrnDBUWbmvdZpN/8bq3rJSsNn6U9aRqsOd33qqh3QyD99QWbV7QneqxS0xgFn8di8 +nlizhfF0xQbGZRk=
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from mail.dlp.master (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app07-12007 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee76a97e90b250-a2c5f; Wed, 02 Sep 2026 17:14:51 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee76a97e90b250-a2c5f
Received: from wxh.mailtest (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dlp.master (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4326B15A02FA; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 17:14:51 +0800 (CST)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown [10.230.70.214]) by mail.dlp.master (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6387D15A02F9; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 17:14:25 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from ZY (unknown[117.133.22.26]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr10-12010 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eea6a97e8f0663-f475c; Wed, 02 Sep 2026 17:14:25 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eea6a97e8f0663-f475c
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 17:14:25 +0800
From: "zhaoyangyjy@chinamobile.com" <zhaoyangyjy@chinamobile.com>
To: "Andrew Stone (Nokia)" <andrew.stone@nokia.com>, "daniele.ietf@gmail.com" <daniele.ietf@gmail.com>, Lixiao <lixiao33@huawei.com>, 윤빈영 <byyun@etri.re.kr>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>, "weiw@bupt.edu.cn" <weiw@bupt.edu.cn>, "peter.park@kt.com" <peter.park@kt.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <CH0PR08MB73531A1269497D79E6EA58F591A92@CH0PR08MB7353.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 0436BC67-205D-47EC-8FB0-61042D675011
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.433[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202609021714247356711@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart130113687715_=----"
Message-ID-Hash: 4J4BSKDTIJVYKX4BUO54S6WVQFDZ4L7K
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4J4BSKDTIJVYKX4BUO54S6WVQFDZ4L7K
X-MailFrom: zhaoyangyjy@chinamobile.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pce.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Pce] Re: IPR poll for draft-lee-pce-pcep-ls-optical
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/b3oEdtx99scXFTN6WqcFW9xQ1U8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pce-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pce-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pce-leave@ietf.org>

Hi all,

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules.

Best regards,
Yang Zhao


 
From: Andrew Stone (Nokia)
Date: 2026-09-01 03:44
To: zhaoyangyjy@chinamobile.com; daniele.ietf@gmail.com; lixiao33@huawei.com; byyun@etri.re.kr; adrian@olddog.co.uk; Dhruv Dhody; zhenghaomian@huawei.com; weiw@bupt.edu.cn; peter.park@kt.com; pce@ietf.org; pce-chairs
Subject: IPR poll for draft-lee-pce-pcep-ls-optical
Hi Authors, 
 
In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, we'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPRrules.
 
Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:
 
- I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
 
- I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF.
 
- I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a timely manner.
 
Thanks,
Andrew
PCE Secretary

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status