[Pce] [PCE] and [CCAMP] discussion on Explicit Control of Region Boundary
fu.xihua@zte.com.cn Thu, 18 March 2010 01:54 UTC
Return-Path: <fu.xihua@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B243A69ED; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.708
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.708 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G2gP8K6s3Det; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx6.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [63.218.89.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491533A689A; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.99] by mx6.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 128641914610606; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:54:06 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [192.168.168.1] by [192.168.168.15] with StormMail ESMTP id 64572.1914610606; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:55:01 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse1.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id o2I1swa3069338; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:54:58 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from fu.xihua@zte.com.cn)
To: ccamp@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005
Message-ID: <OF483EA1F0.DECBCB8A-ON482576EA.000795EE-482576EA.000A8456@zte.com.cn>
From: fu.xihua@zte.com.cn
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:56:57 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 2010-03-18 09:54:56, Serialize complete at 2010-03-18 09:54:56
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 000A8451482576EA_="
X-MAIL: mse1.zte.com.cn o2I1swa3069338
Subject: [Pce] [PCE] and [CCAMP] discussion on Explicit Control of Region Boundary
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:54:57 -0000
Hi All, The topic of Explicit Control of Region Boundary has been discussed in the 76th meeting. Following is the presentation in CCAMP and PCE. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/76/slides/ccamp-28/ccamp-28.htm http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/76/slides/pce-10/pce-10.htm For the upcoming 77th meeting, the original draft has been split into the following three drafts. 1. A framework for Explicit Control of Region Boundary in PCE: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuxh-pce-boundary-explicit-control-framework-01 2. PCEP extension for Explicit Control of Region Boundary in PCE: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuxh-pce-boundary-explicit-control-pcep-ext-00 3. RSVP-TE extension for Explicit Control of Region Boundary in CCAMP: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-00 If you have any comments, please don't hesitate to tell us. Xihua Fu ZTE Corporation