[Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-filter-05
xiong.quan@zte.com.cn Wed, 15 April 2026 09:52 UTC
Return-Path: <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46E6DCA5491; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 02:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1776246735; bh=RiBr+VnSlLAOSQ7oJPzUv80r7LxMY/OGGFOICHMFASg=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject; b=J/12B5DSM5FNYP6t51RVeC3lK+aNOU45nKtuKP2AbQQuAtxVgh8WV+m3h8TlNqeAQ ry/A70+6BysZ6iN2bJZbOlihdt/0m5Qf3cqNuFHk8wSz2GdxKm90Q2V1FMwONMqsKl w4WALAsHDa4IKVfhLwgXAZ0TaZ0HF2yILg2MDnWQ=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6VBHiD6o3nLT; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 02:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [160.30.148.34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAFF1DCA548A; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 02:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4fwbz04rltz5B0p2; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 17:52:12 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njy2app08.zte.com.cn ([10.40.13.206]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 63F9pLCM049610; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 17:51:59 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from xiong.quan@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Wed, 15 Apr 2026 17:52:01 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa69df5fc16cc-0ec7c
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20260415175201556fmplKXxmR2FYEmi070n2v@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <06a301dcc8e8$c7020b00$55062100$@olddog.co.uk>
References: CAP7zK5ZkPW3BeboBRT9jA+7Zc7-F5WpZTjZJTkJTPvBjSPej6A@mail.gmail.com,06a301dcc8e8$c7020b00$55062100$@olddog.co.uk
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 17:52:01 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 63F9pLCM049610
X-TLS: YES
X-SPF-DOMAIN: zte.com.cn
X-ENVELOPE-SENDER: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
X-SPF: None
X-SOURCE-IP: 10.5.228.133 unknown Wed, 15 Apr 2026 17:52:12 +0800
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 69DF5FCC.001/4fwbz04rltz5B0p2
Message-ID-Hash: YRDWD7NVGDLOAKLWXCXSANQRSI373W6L
X-Message-ID-Hash: YRDWD7NVGDLOAKLWXCXSANQRSI373W6L
X-MailFrom: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pce.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: pce@ietf.org, pce-chairs@ietf.org, draft-xpbs-pce-topology-filter@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-filter-05
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/czbeGw7RJBEA0XmPK6YFqdkKZmY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pce-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pce-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pce-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Adrian, Many thanks for your support and your suggestions! Your concerns will be addressed in next version as following shown. 1, RFC7752 will be updated to RFC9552 in section 3.1.1.2. 2,RFC8174 will be added to the reference for BCP 14. 3, RFC9543 will be added to the reference for "NRP". 4, More background description will be added to the abstract. 5,A topology also can be associated with an NRP and the NRP TLV has been defined in draft-ietf-pce-pcep-nrp. Some clarification will be added and refered to this I-D. 6, The TOPOLOGY FILTER object is newly requested to make allocations in IANA. I will check and clarify the registries. 7,The section of operational considerations will be added in next version. The version will be updated as soon as possible with other comments and suggestions. Thanks! Best Regards, Quan Original From: AdrianFarrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> To: 'Dhruv Dhody' <dd@dhruvdhody.com>;pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org>; Cc: 'pce-chairs' <pce-chairs@ietf.org>;draft-xpbs-pce-topology-filter@ietf.org <draft-xpbs-pce-topology-filter@ietf.org>; Date: 2026年04月10日 20:51 Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-filter-05 Well, why not? I think some work will be needed, but nothing that blocks adoption. 7752 has been replaced by 9552, but only half of the references have been updated The BCP14 boilerplate is out of date Would be good to give a reference for “NRP” The Abstract is a bit too short Why is NRP Selector not one of the filter rules? The IANA section is not clear enough about which registries are being used I believe operational considerations will be quite important for this work Cheers, Adrian From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Sent: 10 April 2026 12:52 To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-xpbs-pce-topology-filter@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-filter-05 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-xpbs-pce-topology-filter-05 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xpbs-pce-topology-filter/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons: Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Monday 27th Apr 2026. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien
- [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-filt… Dhruv Dhody
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… Adrian Farrel
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… Aijun Wang
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… xiong.quan
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… Adrian Farrel
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… zhaojunfeng@caict.ac.cn
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… xiong.quan
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… chen.ran
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… 韩政鑫(联通集团本部)
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… zhangli (CE)
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… xiong.quan
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… xiong.quan
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… zhangli (CE)
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… xiong.quan
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… xiong.quan
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… xiong.quan
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… Dhruv Dhody
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… xiong.quan
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… xiong.quan
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
- [Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-xpbs-pce-topology-… xiong.quan