Re: [Pce] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com> Thu, 31 August 2017 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DB91321AC; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 23:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GE1x0EyKAOZN; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 23:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4C7513218F; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 23:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DUM63279; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 06:38:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from BLREML703-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.172) by LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:38:20 +0100
Received: from BLREML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.20.5.198]) by blreml703-cah.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:08:08 +0530
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis@ietf.org>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTIf6caLb18FVtkkuE4/x/Sh9Fr6Kd/wjg
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 06:38:08 +0000
Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8CBBD662@blreml501-mbx>
References: <150414552903.16896.13672149203420824576.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150414552903.16896.13672149203420824576.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.149.39]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.59A7AEDD.0099, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 89affa1867f27ab508a8bee3e2d73d10
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/dxmvExqb_s3IaMmN57aKipqQnaw>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 06:38:25 -0000

Hi Suresh, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan
> Sent: 31 August 2017 07:42
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; pce-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-
> rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> * Appendix A:
> 
> Did you mean "responses" instead of "requests" in this sentence?
> 
> "Update to the reply message to allow for bundling of multiple
>       path computation requests..."
> 
[[Dhruv Dhody]] Ack. Updated. 

> * I agree with Benoit and Mirja that summarizing all the changes since
> RFC6006 would be useful (Thanks for doing this for the RBNF!)
> 
[[Dhruv Dhody]] Updated the appendix A. 

See working copy at - 
https://github.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/blob/master/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt
Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt

Thanks! 
Dhruv

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce