Re: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)

Thanks.

Make sure it appears in the ToC.

Regards, B.
> Hi Benoit, Adrian,
>
> I have updated Appendix A to include all changes from RFC6006 and made the RBNF changes as a sub-section.
>
> See working copy at -
> https://github.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/blob/master/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt
> Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
>> Sent: 30 August 2017 17:39
>> To: 'Benoit Claise' <bclaise@cisco.com>; 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
>> Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; pce-chairs@ietf.org;
>> 'Fred Baker' <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-
>> rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)
>>
>> Morning Komrade Claise,
>>
>> Did you spot Appendix A?
>>
>> A
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise
>>> Sent: 30 August 2017 10:32
>>> To: The IESG
>>> Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org;
>>> pce-chairs@ietf.org;
>> Fred
>>> Baker
>>> Subject: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-
>> rfc6006bis-03:
>> (with
>>> COMMENT)
>>>
>>> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
>>> draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: No Objection
>>>
>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
>>> this introductory paragraph, however.)
>>>
>>>
>>> Please refer to
>>> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>>
>>>
>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> COMMENT:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> - Where is the "diff from RFC6006" section?
>>> The following is not useful:
>>>
>>>         This document obsoletes RFC 6006 and incorporates all outstanding
>>>         Errata:
>>>
>>>         o Erratum with IDs: 3819, 3830, 3836, 4867, and 4868.
>>>
>>> I found "Appendix A. Summary of the RBNF Changes from RFC 6006", as a
>>> good start, but it doesn't even appear in the table of content. Why?
>>>
>>> - I've not been following the IPR situation (as described by Alvaro),
>>> but
>> would
>>> like to understand and it should be discussed during the telechat. Is
>>> it the case that https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1686/ (related to
>>> RFC6006) is updated by https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2983/ (related
>>> to RFC6006 and RFC6006bis)?
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pce mailing list
>>> Pce@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pce mailing list
>> Pce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> .
>