Re: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)

Hi Benoit, Adrian, 

I have updated Appendix A to include all changes from RFC6006 and made the RBNF changes as a sub-section. 

See working copy at - 
https://github.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/blob/master/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt
Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt

Thanks! 
Dhruv

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 30 August 2017 17:39
> To: 'Benoit Claise' <bclaise@cisco.com>; 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; pce-chairs@ietf.org;
> 'Fred Baker' <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-
> rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Morning Komrade Claise,
> 
> Did you spot Appendix A?
> 
> A
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise
> > Sent: 30 August 2017 10:32
> > To: The IESG
> > Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org;
> > pce-chairs@ietf.org;
> Fred
> > Baker
> > Subject: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-
> rfc6006bis-03:
> (with
> > COMMENT)
> >
> > Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> > this introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > - Where is the "diff from RFC6006" section?
> > The following is not useful:
> >
> >        This document obsoletes RFC 6006 and incorporates all outstanding
> >        Errata:
> >
> >        o Erratum with IDs: 3819, 3830, 3836, 4867, and 4868.
> >
> > I found "Appendix A. Summary of the RBNF Changes from RFC 6006", as a
> > good start, but it doesn't even appear in the table of content. Why?
> >
> > - I've not been following the IPR situation (as described by Alvaro),
> > but
> would
> > like to understand and it should be discussed during the telechat. Is
> > it the case that https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1686/ (related to
> > RFC6006) is updated by https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2983/ (related
> > to RFC6006 and RFC6006bis)?
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pce mailing list
> > Pce@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce