[Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12

Roni Even <roni.even@mail01.huawei.com> Sun, 26 February 2017 09:49 UTC

Return-Path: <roni.even@mail01.huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D548129464; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 01:49:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even <roni.even@mail01.huawei.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.46.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148810254318.12511.13035845809455980126.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 01:49:03 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/fjrAYwseTUYYBw3OuzpI09aoy0I>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext.all@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 09:49:03 -0000

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2017-02-26
IETF LC End Date: 2017-03-01
IESG Telechat date: 2017-03-16

Summary: This draft is  ready for publication as a standard track
RFC.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: 

In section 2 "Those TE links exist at the layer/region boarder
normally" should be "border"