[Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12
Roni Even <roni.even@mail01.huawei.com> Sun, 26 February 2017 09:49 UTC
Return-Path: <roni.even@mail01.huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D548129464; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 01:49:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even <roni.even@mail01.huawei.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.46.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148810254318.12511.13035845809455980126.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 01:49:03 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/fjrAYwseTUYYBw3OuzpI09aoy0I>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext.all@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 09:49:03 -0000
Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2017-02-26 IETF LC End Date: 2017-03-01 IESG Telechat date: 2017-03-16 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a standard track RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: In section 2 "Those TE links exist at the layer/region boarder normally" should be "border"