IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-pceps-07 available

Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk> Thu, 21 January 2016 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <nite@hq.sk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828141B33B1 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:48:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SK=1.35, HOST_EQ_SK=0.555, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id re9o4sK2mx5L for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hq.sk (hq.sk [81.89.59.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ADC1ABD3C for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.0.179] (188-167-8-120.dynamic.chello.sk [188.167.8.120]) by mail.hq.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 171AA242020; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 22:48:19 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hq.sk; s=mail; t=1453412899; bh=ii0BevYN2KITxrNH+B6aZfe+ZdtdYRlp7NldGsRPj+w=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=iBrbP3LonU7sC9jnPz72XVMWYAUB/xOm4DWBBPsdKTEcHrI2TAUz3oJoVMD+/p15Z AwJX8KshNR3jC8mQ0xB0c9J/rrTjnUQXybr81A+2YacemlRnAAfyj9+DBkeP1Jj3Wa EIX1bxgAWRqKBvpfIwcpfxJxd1Um+d7TpG6S0zGQ=
To: DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
References: <06EC97F2-E307-4AB9-AF08-ABFAAAE20B42@telefonica.com>
From: Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk>
Message-ID: <56A15221.1090808@hq.sk>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 22:48:17 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <06EC97F2-E307-4AB9-AF08-ABFAAAE20B42@telefonica.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020004030002080308030001"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/jIyKSXcxhooQicHwMIbRPAflf5g>
Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-pceps-07 available
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 21:48:23 -0000


On 2016-01-21 15:07, DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have just uploaded a new version of draft-ietf-pce-pceps 
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pceps/)
>
> We believe this new version addresses all the comments received from 
> the SECDIR review after the last call period, and other pending ones 
> provided by Tom while that SECDIR review was taking place. As far as 
> the authors can say, the document is ready to progress.
>

Hello,

would it make sense to request an early codepoint allocation for use in 
implementations?

Thanks,
Robert

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email