Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-09.txt
<daniel@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 10 June 2019 11:58 UTC
Return-Path: <dk@danielking.net>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F510120177 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 04:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=danielking-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OUfokEhYkLXh for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 04:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AB1012009C for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 04:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id z23so7884434wma.4 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 04:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielking-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=l8iTfxne2MByd6qrnAELVxIXBhvcuY8nIIEhj0YFHhU=; b=fa6Rw20S5E0T/S9TpVotWeLn0wuanuBxs2zwtpI1QOExvz/Toe22SpIaXEPzvpZsa/ 1yIkFRTL/q8ESHdZLzXrcPnDVJ5gTmPbYWdSls7yPQZAoH1QbHYfe5gIqy6MJaRQ3940 R4wLPLpwybNz+A7VxB8gmhRsbnXSyzL1gygU9gqMwKNfsy9pO/sip5mYPtdHnDHQoidd NXurh8JYPG4d9o4pmkys4r/zcfqo3YQcYv5AMWbD3egjVMZrUWdosELUxvs9HvvfK3Tt 60mE0ik4/QTeXSy0IJJ7RZOt0g7ckXr7zALE8CApR25R2EERpVZPfwPG9AQQK0XxDG/H ZNEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=l8iTfxne2MByd6qrnAELVxIXBhvcuY8nIIEhj0YFHhU=; b=s9dgyEYpUMEkEi7LgxL1GsY8/jE9MmAE0Puk0qdFhZ9AlKqbncpoiAWjYpnYXJ/eZx N2QE2lm9aUhX9C98dIyaTz1snrz0HsOL7BFGNTaQR60zC9nbl0G5TYmXiDo45UXy2l9m GE3ZPz4Vj8NS5rjcZZr45vuxDmrFjkyio6TgsZqkfoR4EtKqBenuSuUiEgRDzfQXe6Gj +gkChC+3N/Q49W7E0nbiNDmQ9hpzUj/hyGFKRHl1x2rS5QANpYej3YmcS04vdoEuXjEb xwLh81+9vt2v1VE0QjcWlQa3lRAOXqKvHdUjBHT/nXXn8+XPHb619hRDsldKFgd1sy+I Dkmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXDwll4RncJ6fvndglnTIE2hyPYjD0m2+2RHCxfjlTjRKCXooiE rq4WVP+U/sZpO9121O7Z0VqmvG1YSu2sHA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx9N/Yi1dPLYi2Y/927anaP0lYz9PnLtNlfhGOBZ+szRBB8t5uYQV3g8KrNGyt+9DuKnefH1A==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c14b:: with SMTP id r72mr13254399wmf.166.1560167922017; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 04:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CIPHER (host86-157-191-178.range86-157.btcentralplus.com. [86.157.191.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o11sm6680679wmh.37.2019.06.10.04.58.40 for <pce@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 04:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
X-Google-Original-Sender: "Daniel King" <dk@danielking.net>
From: daniel@olddog.co.uk
To: pce@ietf.org
References: <156016674731.10569.10989032605156122660@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156016674731.10569.10989032605156122660@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 12:58:39 +0100
Message-ID: <00d101d51f83$d7b1fac0$8715f040$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHF8litA7OfiTDvEVADPUO/Mkur8aazIoDg
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/kANtdPVlQAKaiwCyIgJVEv3xYXM>
Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-09.txt
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:58:47 -0000
Hi All, A new version updating author email addresses and catching a couple of NITS. BR, Dan. -----Original Message----- From: I-D-Announce <i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: 10 June 2019 12:39 To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-09.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. Title : Hierarchical Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE). Authors : Dhruv Dhody Young Lee Daniele Ceccarelli Jongyoon Shin Daniel King Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Filename : draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-09.txt Pages : 22 Date : 2019-06-10 Abstract: A Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) maintains information on the current network state, including: computed Label Switched Path (LSPs), reserved resources within the network, and pending path computation requests. This information may then be considered when computing new traffic engineered LSPs, and for associated and dependent LSPs, received from Path Computation Clients (PCCs). The Path computation response from a PCE is helpful for the PCC to gracefully establish the computed LSP. The Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE) architecture, provides an architecture to allow the optimum sequence of inter-connected domains to be selected, and network policy to be applied if applicable, via the use of a hierarchical relationship between PCEs. Combining the capabilities of Stateful PCE and the Hierarchical PCE would be advantageous. This document describes general considerations and use cases for the deployment of Stateful, and not Stateless, PCEs using the Hierarchical PCE architecture. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-09 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-09 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-09 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt