[Pce] [PCE] Solicit comments for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-01
Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com> Fri, 08 July 2016 09:49 UTC
Return-Path: <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF18412B004 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 02:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q9F6cUyiZveI for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 02:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 247C612D115 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 02:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CSF79433; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 09:49:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:49:24 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 17:49:13 +0800
From: Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [PCE] Solicit comments for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-01
Thread-Index: AQHR2PoA8bD0SBIah029Gfp6arwMpKAORXwA
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 09:49:13 +0000
Message-ID: <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858AA1D7313@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.86.254]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090201.577F7725.00F6, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 0270db5295710a69891f7d1ce25a96e9
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/kS5F7ucnc1iTBcjMplPCdk3qo04>
Subject: [Pce] [PCE] Solicit comments for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-01
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 09:49:31 -0000
PCE group, We have taken the comments from the BA meeting and updated the document, some changes as follows: - limits PCEP flowspec to “redirect to tunnel” only - Clarity with encoding of BGP flowspec information inside PCEPTLV - Adding ROUTE-DISTINGUISHER TLV from PCEP-LS - Updating IANA section Hope you could have interest in this draft, help to review or refine. You comments will be appreciated. Thanks & Regards,, Shunwan -----邮件原件----- 发件人: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2016年7月8日 17:20 收件人: Chenxia (D); Lizhenbin; Cyril Margaria; Colby Barth; Zhuangshunwan; Dhruv Dhody 主题: New Version Notification for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-01.txt A new version of I-D, draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Shunwan Zhuang and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec Revision: 01 Title: PCEP Extension for Flow Specification Document date: 2016-07-08 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 18 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-01 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-01 Abstract: Dissemination of the traffic flow specifications was first introduced in the BGP protocol via RFC 5575. In order to distribute the flow specifications from PCE controller to network device without BGP protocol it is desirable to extend PCEP with flow specification information. This document specifies a set of extensions to PCEP to support dissemination of flow specifications. The extensions include the instantiation, updation and deletion of flow specifications. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat
- [Pce] [PCE] Solicit comments for draft-li-pce-pce… Zhuangshunwan