IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-03

Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> Tue, 12 November 2013 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF6411E815F for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:17:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GleZqyZah2ay for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:17:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.orange.com (p-mail2.rd.orange.com [195.101.245.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B4511E814C for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:17:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id E00CC1074003 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:20:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by p-mail2.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E841074002 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:20:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:17:47 +0100
Received: from [10.193.71.94] ([10.193.71.94]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:17:47 +0100
Message-ID: <5282388A.7080904@orange.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:17:46 +0100
From: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Nov 2013 14:17:47.0227 (UTC) FILETIME=[F626DAB0:01CEDFB1]
Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-03
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:17:55 -0000

Hi again.

Following the support expressed in the room during our meeting in 
Vancouver, we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you 
support draft-zhang-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-03 to become a 
foundation for a PCE WG document?

As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory 
in case of opposition).

Thanks,

JP & Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email