Re: [Pce] [PCE]Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[John Scudder <[e-mail]>]

Quan — Looks good to me, thank you.

Lars — I believe your DISCUSS has been taken care of, please take a look.

Thanks,

—John

> On Oct 23, 2022, at 4:09 AM, [e-mail] wrote:
> 
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
> 
> 
> Hi Jonn and Dhruv,
> 
> Thanks for your detailed review and suggestions!
> I submitted a -09 version to resolve the following three issues.
> 1, In  Section 5, paragraph 2, "would" was replaced to "MUST".
> 2, In Section 9, a sentence was added at the end with "Assuming that recommendation is followed, then the flags will be protected by TLS." Thanks for the suggestion from John.
> 3,  In Section 9, the second sentence was revised to "Any future document that specifies new flags must also discuss any  associated security implications."  Thanks for the suggestion from Dhruv.
> Please let me know if you have other comments and suggestions.
> 
> Regards,
> Quan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: JohnScudder <[e-mail]>
> To: 熊泉00091065;
> Cc: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
> Date: 2022年10月23日 02:55
> Subject: Re: [PCE]Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> On Oct 22, 2022, at 1:14 PM, John Scudder <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> if you want to, you could add one sentence to the end of Section 9, perhaps “If that recommendation is followed, then the flags will be protected by TLS."
> 
> Or maybe better, “Assuming that recommendation is followed, then the flags will be protected by TLS.“
> 
> —John