Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-09.txt

Hi WG,

This update makes following changes - 

	~ Align terminology to [RFC7471] and [draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions] with respect to Metric Type names. 
	~ Rearrange section for Stateful PCE section.
	~ Other editorial changes. 

See diff - https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-08&url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-09

This draft is in queue to be last called.

Regards,
Dhruv (on behalf of co-authors/contributors)  	 

本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁
止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中
的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-
> drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: 17 March 2016 13:39
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-09.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : Extensions to the Path Computation Element
> Communication Protocol (PCEP) to compute service aware Label Switched Path
> (LSP).
>         Authors         : Dhruv Dhody
>                           Qin Wu
>                           Vishwas Manral
>                           Zafar Ali
>                           Kenji Kumaki
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-09.txt
> 	Pages           : 26
> 	Date            : 2016-03-17
> 
> Abstract:
>    In certain networks, such as, but not limited to, financial
>    information networks (e.g. stock market data providers), network
>    performance criteria (e.g. latency) are becoming as critical to data
>    path selection as other metrics and constraints.  These metrics are
>    associated with the Service Level Agreement (SLA) between customers
>    and service providers.  The Link Bandwidth Utilization (the total
>    bandwidth of a link in current use for the forwarding) is another
>    important factor to consider during path computation.
> 
>    IGP Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric extensions describes mechanisms
>    with which network performance information is distributed via OSPF
>    and IS-IS respectively.  The Path Computation Element Communication
>    Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements
>    (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation
>    Clients (PCCs) requests.  This document describes the extension to
>    PCEP to carry Latency, Latency Variation, Packet Loss, and Link
>    Bandwidth Utilization as constraints for end to end path computation.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-09
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-09
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce