[Pce] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-10.txt> (Local Protection Enforcement in PCEP) to Proposed Standard

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Fri, 19 May 2023 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD83C14E515; Fri, 19 May 2023 09:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 10.4.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
CC: draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement@ietf.org, jgs@juniper.net, julien.meuric@orange.com, pce-chairs@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org
Reply-To: last-call@ietf.org
Sender: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <168451459914.24110.11076617762524604473@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 09:43:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/oXNoMBe7--69lkebG6sB56Qn1j4>
Subject: [Pce] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-10.txt> (Local Protection Enforcement in PCEP) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 16:43:19 -0000

The IESG has received a request from the Path Computation Element WG (pce) to
consider the following document: - 'Local Protection Enforcement in PCEP'
  <draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-10.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2023-06-02. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   This document extends the base specification to clarify usage of the
   local protection desired bit signalled in the Path Computation
   Element Protocol (PCEP).  This document also introduces a new flag
   for signalling protection strictness in PCEP.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement/



No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.