Re: [Pce] Proposed Standard Track for "draft-ietf-pce-pceps"
Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk> Mon, 27 June 2016 12:12 UTC
Return-Path: <nite@hq.sk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A1C12B008; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 05:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.426
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.426 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hq.sk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z6KdJmPAlh4n; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 05:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hq.sk (hq.sk [81.89.59.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15F381288B8; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 05:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.137.1.13] (46.229.239.158.host.vnet.sk [46.229.239.158]) by mail.hq.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 326D3242EA2; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:12:47 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hq.sk; s=mail; t=1467029567; bh=zokW7zZ1B1sB2cVpdiX9nQrHww2D8MG3XgrAD1cKSk8=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=GtosHzgH/Z/EfB+WmiKf0MWdMJXG2gvqsPrZoBA9n/smAHB3KSm3Ob+ANE1DzQPeI ts2ToVSOe2JtVlognRFeQsPU3jOyeVZIQjPYcqEMYJ8/+jZFBClOjfIXtXX6GYjpja 6tDV5R1AP80kwbxE+b1CkBeVIi5Peot+I8fL5e38=
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
References: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8C8A06AC@blreml501-mbb>
From: Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk>
Message-ID: <65409b67-94f7-f399-038c-f2a312f25650@hq.sk>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:12:45 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8C8A06AC@blreml501-mbb>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wbwUM9XQWSVdcEMe2n3k2fctv75k5EiQe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ovKHgDecnFdCjNGFZFDdszZsxSo>
Cc: "draft-ietf-pce-pceps@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-pceps@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Proposed Standard Track for "draft-ietf-pce-pceps"
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:12:53 -0000
On 06/23/2016 04:27 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote: > We wanted to hear from the WG if there are any objections to moving the > document to standards track. > No objections, I think this would be very useful as a standard. Thanks, Robert
- [Pce] Proposed Standard Track for "draft-ietf-pce… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Proposed Standard Track for "draft-ietf… Robert Varga