Re: [Pce] Some proposal for the next revision of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext
Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Sun, 30 October 2011 20:58 UTC
Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEC721F8B90 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.412
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.412 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.187, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gKx-dJCTeysa for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usaga04-in.huawei.com (usaga04-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E306B21F84DA for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga04-in [172.18.4.101]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LTW009UICXJ8F@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for pce@ietf.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 15:58:31 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.18.4.104]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LTW00FHRCXIH0@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for pce@ietf.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 15:58:31 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from DFWEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.101) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:58:30 -0700
Received: from DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.124.31.87]) by DFWEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::f07f:889f:78ef:8df3%13]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:58:24 -0700
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:58:22 +0000
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <D5EABC6FDAFDAA47BC803114C68AABF2030178B1@DEMUEXC012.nsn-intra.net>
X-Originating-IP: [10.47.139.243]
To: "Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)" <cyril.margaria@nsn.com>, "draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext@tools.ietf.org" <draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext@tools.ietf.org>
Message-id: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E17181836BA@DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Accept-Language: en-US
Thread-topic: Some proposal for the next revision of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext
Thread-index: AcyULHddQ2l1gBE9S0SmCLWryZlL3wDGaqUA
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
References: <D5EABC6FDAFDAA47BC803114C68AABF2030178B1@DEMUEXC012.nsn-intra.net>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Some proposal for the next revision of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:58:32 -0000
Hi Cyril, Objective functions for GCO contexts and others are definitely an optional requirement for PCEP extension for RWA. In the past, the PCE WG had one objective function draft separate from PCEP draft. So my inclination is to ask the PCE WG if this requirement should be a part of this draft or to separate this work into a new item. I will include this OF requirement in the revision, which will shortly be published. Thanks, Young -----Original Message----- From: Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:cyril.margaria@nsn.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 5:13 PM To: draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext@tools.ietf.org Subject: Some proposal for the next revision of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext Hi, Please find attached a proposal on the outline and text regarding a RWA aspect we did not consider up to now : Spectrum optimization Flexigrid discussion brought this in the light but this is a fundamental DWDM RWA aspect, which can be best addressed IMHO by Objective functions, Which will fit also nicely into the GCO context. I thinks it a better solution to draft-zhaoyl-pce-flexi-grid-pcep-ex. I think that at least we should have some indication that standard DWDM has already two spectrum and the assignment should already be considered, Simply by taking the case of a 100Ghz grid : the spectrum can already overlap with 50Gh (and smaller grids) . Your comments/refinement are welcomed. <<draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext-02-comments.txt>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Cyril Margaria Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co. KG NWS DWDM RD St.Martin-Str. 76 D-81541 München Germany mailto:cyril.margaria@nsn.com Phone: +49-89-5159-16934 Fax: +49-89-5159-44-16934 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co. KG Sitz der Gesellschaft: München / Registered office: Munich Registergericht: München / Commercial registry: Munich, HRA 88537 WEEE-Reg.-Nr.: DE 52984304 Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin / General Partner: Nokia Siemens Networks Management GmbH Geschäftsleitung / Board of Directors: Dr. Hermann Rodler, Lydia Sommer, Olaf Horsthemke Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats / Chairman of supervisory board: Herbert Merz Sitz der Gesellschaft: München / Registered office: Munich Registergericht: München / Commercial registry: Munich, HRB 163416