[Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5520 (3583)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 07 April 2013 20:22 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720FD21F8E5A for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 13:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.373
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.373 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.227, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sw97twXtrD8W for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 13:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F9B21F8ACE for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 13:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2CA8BB1E002; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 13:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: rbradfor@cisco.com, jpv@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, stbryant@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, jpv@cisco.com, julien.meuric@orange.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20130407202155.2CA8BB1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:21:55 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 02:15:39 -0700
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5520 (3583)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 20:22:21 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5520, "Preserving Topology Confidentiality in Inter-Domain Path Computation Using a Path-Key-Based Mechanism". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5520&eid=3583 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Section: 3.2.3 Original Text ------------- The format of a PCReq message is as follows: <PCReq Message>::= <Common Header> [<SVEC-list>] <request-list> where: <svec-list>::=<SVEC>[<svec-list>] <request-list>::=<request>[<request-list>] Corrected Text -------------- The format of a PCReq message is as follows: <PCReq Message>::= <Common Header> [<svec-list>] <request-list> where: <svec-list>::=<SVEC>[<svec-list>] <request-list>::=<request>[<request-list>] Notes ----- The corrected text is as RFC5440 section 6.4, the editorial difference is <SVEC-list> in RFC5520 and in RFC5440 is <svec-list>. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5520 (draft-ietf-pce-path-key-05) -------------------------------------- Title : Preserving Topology Confidentiality in Inter-Domain Path Computation Using a Path-Key-Based Mechanism Publication Date : April 2009 Author(s) : R. Bradford, Ed., JP. Vasseur, A. Farrel Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Path Computation Element Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5520 (3583) RFC Errata System