[Pce] Request WG adoption call for draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-04

"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com> Tue, 12 March 2019 08:54 UTC

Return-Path: <chengli13@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4C9130F01; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KxrjBBLckadI; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F3E812F19D; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id EEF5DAA56119AF8A515A; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:54:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.58) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:54:13 +0000
Received: from lhreml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.58) by lhreml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:54:13 +0000
Received: from DGGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.39) by lhreml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:54:13 +0000
Received: from DGGEML529-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.70]) by DGGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::b177:a243:7a69:5ab8%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:54:04 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
CC: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>, Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi@cisco.com>, Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>, Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: Request WG adoption call for draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-04
Thread-Index: AdTYsNX0vynan94XRO6g5x0mDRinyw==
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:54:03 +0000
Message-ID: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB025A3C8D@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.185.75]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/qfidVzW81GpZByty5TT8YIY2Jik>
Subject: [Pce] Request WG adoption call for draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-04
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:54:19 -0000

Hi WG and Chairs,

We have updated the draft to address review comments from Marina Fizgeer and Quan Xiong.
The comments were applicable to draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir and draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path, so both have been updated accordingly (we share some authors between these drafts!).

1) The F-bit in the figure represents the directions of LSP from PCC point of view (as opposed to PCE point of view).
2) Clarify PLSP-ID for bidirectional LSP in Section 5.
3) Adding Quan Xiong from ZTE as a co-author in contributor section.
4) Various editorial changes.

Diff - https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-02&url2=draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-04

SPRING WG has adopted the architecture document draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00 and bi-directional SR is one of the key use-case, we think it is ready for WG adoption, so we request for the WG adoption poll for this document.

Welcome your review comments and suggestions. 
Many thanks to Marina Fizgeer for excellent review!

Thanks,
Cheng (on behalf of authors)



-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 4:34 AM
To: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi@cisco.com>; Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>; Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>; Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>; Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>; Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>; Chengli (Cheng Li) <chengli13@huawei.com>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-04.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-04.txt has been successfully submitted by Rakesh Gandhi and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path
Revision:	04
Title:		PCEP Extensions for Associated Bidirectional Segment Routing (SR) Paths
Document date:	2019-03-11
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		15
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-04.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-04
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-04

Abstract:
   The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides
   mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path
   computations in response to Path Computation Clients (PCCs) requests.
                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat