[Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-09: (with COMMENT)
"Spencer Dawkins" <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 17 November 2015 02:41 UTC
Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AC51ACD57; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:41:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.10.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20151117024103.14243.9401.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:41:03 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/rRKjAxDqUeVp1M91SfPxR3KLCWM>
Cc: pce@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence@ietf.org, pce-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 02:41:03 -0000
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- In this text: The new subobjects introduced by this document will not be understood by a legacy implementation. If one of the subobjects is received in a PCEP object that does not understand it, it will behave as described in Section 3.4.3. I think something is confused. Do PCEP objects understand subobjects? Or is this The new subobjects introduced by this document will not be understood by legacy implementations. If a legacy implementation receives one of the subobjects that it does not understand in a PCEP object, the legacy implementation will behave as described in Section 3.4.3. correct?
- [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-… Dhruv Dhody