Re: [Pce] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags-07: (with COMMENT)

Hi Roman,

Thanks for your review!

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 7:15 AM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags-07: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thank you to Shivan Kaul Sahib for the SECDIR review.
>
> ** Section 9.  Perhaps repeat what is already said in Section 4 here
> (“They are
> also expected to discuss any security implications of the additional flags
> (if
> any) and their interactions with existing flags.”):
>
> OLD
>   This document provides for future addition of flags in the LSP
>    Object.
>
> NEW
> This document provides for the future addition of flags in the LSP
> Object.  The
> documents which will specific these flags must discuss their associate
> security
> implications.
>
>
>
Good suggestion!

Thanks!
Dhruv (as a shepherd)

>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>