IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10

Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> Wed, 16 August 2017 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE261323C3; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.534
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3rtPdczI2qgn; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.orange.com (r-mail1.rd.orange.com [217.108.152.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199821321D9; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id AFEC3A441FB; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:20:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by r-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97AE6A44176; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:20:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.193.71.121] (10.193.71.121) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.352.0; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:20:04 +0200
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, gen-art@ietf.org
CC: draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp.all@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
References: <150240703036.8476.2109418125181500710@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <25b0a2c3-0d8b-0e65-15f7-7e4c360032a9@orange.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:20:01 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <150240703036.8476.2109418125181500710@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/v3v6S4Xt-5htM3chnkmC4_x5y90>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:28:23 -0000

Hi Joel,

Any issue with a request to initiate an LSP setup/teardown to a device? ;-)

I agree the name reads odd, but it has been there for some time now and
the WG seems to be fine with it. Besides, it does not prevent anyone to
add better wording in a patch to their favorite decoding software...

Thanks a lot for your review,

Julien


Aug. 11, 2017 - jmh@joelhalpern.com:
> Nits/editorial comments:
>     It seems odd to have a message for the creation or deletion of an LSP
>     called an LSP Initiate Request.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email