[Pce] Updated draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04.txt

"Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com> Wed, 28 March 2018 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78611124BE8 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 06:05:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.802
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: DNS error: SERVFAIL)" header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ki5GeQEsdW8W for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 06:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03BB51242F7 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 06:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3104; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1522242315; x=1523451915; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=KtA2GntedhWkSFo01STQR1Vfklzw8Q5iVClbWUgV3l0=; b=UISZ5p8rKBEC/eS1cwM9jirDQ0rL1II6gkOhnNEisexR9ifWRHmkaTnE C4pfWMtLfXxWuUz6dVy2qO6FmMNgwmQ1MHXpOg6MQvFl4VMA7jSww/7hf K6JIQ26gMV21rmP3yGnDDDbhdLlVUR9FNi1YH7PaeM6MiUPWEtPXJnuiI A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DaAADFkbta/4gNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYMSL2FvKAqDUogAjQGBU4EwkkoUgWYLJYRfHINzITQYAQIBAQEBAQECax0LhU8RVwEiAiYCBDAVEgQThQ4Pq0OCHIRVg3CCKYEIhlGBVD+BDCIMhWcBAQIBARaBBlOCaTCCJAKLb4tECAKBMoQdiFcKgSU5gx2HLIkRhj8CERMBgSQBHDiBUnAVGUsBghgJkERvAY5VgRcBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,371,1517875200"; d="scan'208";a="371815202"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Mar 2018 13:05:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com (xch-rcd-017.cisco.com [173.37.102.27]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w2SD5D2q012042 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:05:13 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) by XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com (173.37.102.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:05:12 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:05:12 -0500
From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Updated draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHTxpVoKUbpFVwrDkeiMilzq7U6dQ==
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:05:12 +0000
Message-ID: <E57C3416-FD94-4988-A174-5A965F03E720@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1d.0.161209
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.246.181]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <69C40803E71810458FB36754D83CB0E4@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/vI4yRsVzcslFenY8nnAKnuX_Saw>
Subject: [Pce] Updated draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04.txt
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:05:18 -0000

Hi WG,

FYI: This draft has been updated to align with the latest version of draft-ietf-pce-association-group. The changes mostly editorial in nature. Authors believe the document is ready for WG adoption.

Welcome your review comments and suggestions.

Thanks,
Rakesh (for authors)


On 2018-03-27, 4:38 PM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

    
    A new version of I-D, draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04.txt
    has been successfully submitted by Rakesh Gandhi and posted to the
    IETF repository.
    
    Name:		draft-barth-pce-association-bidir
    Revision:	04
    Title:		PCEP Extensions for Associated Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
    Document date:	2018-03-27
    Group:		Individual Submission
    Pages:		15
    URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04.txt
    Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-association-bidir/
    Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
    Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-barth-pce-association-bidir
    Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
    
    Abstract:
       The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides
       mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path
       computations in response to Path Computation Clients (PCCs) requests.
        The Stateful PCE extensions allow stateful control of Multiprotocol
       Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE) Label Switched Paths
       (LSPs) using PCEP.
    
       This document defines PCEP extensions for grouping two reverse
       unidirectional MPLS TE LSPs into an Associated Bidirectional LSP when
       using a Stateful PCE for both PCE-Initiated and PCC-Initiated LSPs as
       well as when using a Stateless PCE.
    
    
                                                                                      
    
    
    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
    until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
    
    The IETF Secretariat