[Pce] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: (with COMMENT)

Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 03 February 2022 01:18 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid@ietf.org, pce-chairs@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, julien.meuric@orange.com, julien.meuric@orange.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <164385110517.9875.10833760081012076306@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 17:18:25 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wuhlYB0qMw6hMY4jBu3aVeehkOM>
Subject: [Pce] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: (with COMMENT)

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

[S4.1; question]

* For clarity, when the locator prefix is a /48 and the nodes are each
  allocated a /64, which of these is expected:

    [a] {LB=48, LN=64, FUN=..., ARG=...}, or

    [b] {LB=48, LN=16, FUN=..., ARG=...}

    (where LB + LN = 64)?

[Pce] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce… Erik Kline via Datatracker
[Pce] 答复: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf… Chengli (Cheng Li)
Re: [Pce] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf… Erik Kline