[Pce] draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-01 (applicability to draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability)

Hi Ramon, All,

We can widen the draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability scope to include
"gaps", one of which may include domain sequence representation. As usual
though, we need to be able to demonstrate that new protocol developments are
clearly required. The work (draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence) is
interesting, but the document is not a WG draft and if I remember correctly
has multiple open issues/options that need to be distilled.

So my first few questions would be:

1. Does the working group need to standardise domain sequence
representation? If so, then I agree
draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability is a viable candidate to document
the requirements.

2. Is draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence a suitable solution? 

3. Should we adopt as a WG document?

If we can answer "yes" to all questions, then I would have no problem
referencing the document in draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability.

Br, Dan. 

-----Original Message-----
From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ramon
Casellas
Sent: 01 February 2012 15:53
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] New Version of draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability
(02)

Dear all, Dan

El 16/01/2012 21:18, Daniel King escribió:
> 3. Are we missing any PCE technology, mechanisms, protocol extensions? 
> So far I think we have touched on the following technologies in the
document:
(snip)
Let me just mention Dhruv's draft on domain sequence encoding. It touches a
quite concrete aspect on domain sequences but I believe it is relevant

Caveat emptor: Yours truly is a co-author.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: 
> draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-02.txt

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce