Re: [Pce] Update to PCE-Yang (draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-02)

[Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]>]

WG,

As suggested in the WG session today related to PCEP-Yang, here are few
pointers on the next step -

(1) Use of Features
- Use features for any PCEP extn after RFC 5440
- Look out for optional features in RFC5440
- At the same time should not try to have too many features

(2) Stateful PCE as the next step
- Some concenses that we should tackle stateful PCE next
- Start with the same draft, we can decide to break if the draft becomes
too big.

(3) Entity-list
- Discussion if PCE-Yang should keep entity-list (borrowed from MIB)
- Initial opinion is to remove it, please let us know what's your opinion.

Please continue to provide us feedback, we plan to make an update
soon(ish).

Thanks!

Dhruv


On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Please find an update to the PCE-Yang draft with following changes -
>
> ~ Support for PCE Information (PCE Discovery Information)
>         * PCE Path Scope
>         * PCE Domain
>         * PCE Neighbor Domain
>         * PCE Capabilities
> ~ Review Comments
>         * One statistics missed "num-req-rcvd-error-sent"
>         * Update in Notifications
> ~ Security Considerations
> ~ Editorial Updates
>
> See diff at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-01&url2=draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-02
>
> Please have a look and provide comments...
>
> Plan is to start work on stateful PCE Yang next.
>
> Regards,
> Dhruv
>
>