IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PCN] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pcn-marking-behaviour-04.txt

<slblake@petri-meat.com> Thu, 25 June 2009 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <slblake@petri-meat.com>
X-Original-To: pcn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780AA3A6DE4 for <pcn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AV+ZIjdHKDUU for <pcn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elom.tchmachines.com (elom.tchmachines.com [208.76.80.198]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A69628C13B for <pcn@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=petri-meat.com) by elom.tchmachines.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <slblake@petri-meat.com>) id 1MJrEM-00069X-Jm; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:51:18 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:51:18 -0400
From: slblake@petri-meat.com
To: philip.eardley@bt.com
In-Reply-To: <4A916DBC72536E419A0BD955EDECEDEC04AD7D28@E03MVB1-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
References: <4A916DBC72536E419A0BD955EDECEDEC04AD7D28@E03MVB1-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
Message-ID: <cda639879e8119cff7d4a80f7acfe63b@petri-meat.com>
X-Sender: slblake@petri-meat.com
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - elom.tchmachines.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - petri-meat.com
Cc: pcn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PCN] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pcn-marking-behaviour-04.txt
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:04:11 -0000

On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:34:23 +0100, <philip.eardley@bt.com> wrote:

> New version that deals with the comments on v3, including those during
> the IETF last call.
> 
> 6.1.  Changes to -04 from -03
> 
>    Updates to take account of IETF last call comments, including a Gen-
>    ART review from David Black, as follows:
> 
>    o  re-phrased of S2.2 first bullet for clarity
> 
>    o  S2.4 re-phrased, so that competing-non-PCN-packets that are
>       metered are covered by the "SHOULD NOT be metered ..." text
> 
>    o  S2.4
> 
>    o  "Packet size independent (excess-traffic-)marking": re-phrased the
>       para in 2.4 for clarity; altered the algorithm in Appendix A so it
>       does PSIM; clarified the explanation in Appendix B.6 in light of
>       this.  Clarified that if packet size independent marking (the
>       SHOULD behaviour) is implemented, then the 'classic' marking
>       doesn't have to be (ie it's only a MUST if PSIM isn't
>       implemented).  Also added info on 'functionally equivalent'
>       behaviour for PSIM.
> 
>    o  added Security Considerations, based on material from RFC5559
> 
>    o  other minor typos and clarifications

Diffs from -03 can be viewed at:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pcn-marking-behaviour-04



Regards,

// Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email