[PCN] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-pcn-sm-edge-behaviour-04.txt

Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net> Tue, 14 September 2010 02:34 UTC

Return-Path: <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
X-Original-To: pcn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419943A6869 for <pcn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FlZm3y83NtU7 for <pcn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc1-s17.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s17.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C607F3A6839 for <pcn@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP91 ([65.55.116.9]) by blu0-omc1-s17.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:34:52 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [76.70.76.104]
X-Originating-Email: [tom111.taylor@bell.net]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP91E737137ABD2A9A51E571D8780@phx.gbl>
Received: from [192.168.2.17] ([76.70.76.104]) by BLU0-SMTP91.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:34:52 -0700
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:34:52 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Thunderbird/3.1.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pcn <pcn@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Sep 2010 02:34:52.0525 (UTC) FILETIME=[68F4C9D0:01CB53B5]
Subject: [PCN] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-pcn-sm-edge-behaviour-04.txt
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 02:34:28 -0000

Here it is at last, brought into line with the CL draft.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [PCN] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pcn-sm-edge-behaviour-04.txt
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
CC: pcn@ietf.org

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Congestion and Pre-Congestion 
Notification Working Group of the IETF.


	Title           : PCN Boundary Node Behaviour for the Single Marking 
(SM) Mode of Operation
	Author(s)       : A. Charny, et al.
	Filename        : draft-ietf-pcn-sm-edge-behaviour-04.txt
	Pages           : 17
	Date            : 2010-09-13

Pre-congestion notification (PCN) is a means for protecting the
quality of service for inelastic traffic admitted to a Diffserv
domain.  The overall PCN architecture is described in RFC 5559.  This
memo is one of a series describing possible boundary node behaviours
for a PCN-domain.  The behaviour described here is that for a form of
measurement-based load control using two PCN marking states, not-
marked, and excess-traffic-marked.  This behaviour is known
informally as the Single Marking (SM) PCN edge behaviour.
...