[PCN] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5559 (3565)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 26 March 2013 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A7221F8B8D for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.267, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DaRDjFzCoRO4 for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379FE21F8B7E for <pcn@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 1123372E14E; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
To: philip.eardley@bt.com, martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu, sob@harvard.edu, slblake@petri-meat.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20130326145524.1123372E14E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: pcn@ietf.org, michawe@ifi.uio.no, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [PCN] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5559 (3565)
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:55:49 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5559,
"Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) Architecture".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5559&eid=3565

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>

Section: 10.2

Original Text
-------------
   [Moncaster09-1]  Moncaster, T., Briscoe, B., and M. Menth, "Baseline
                    Encoding and Transport of Pre-Congestion
                    Information", Work in Progress, May 2009.

Corrected Text
--------------
   [Moncaster09-1]  Moncaster, T., Briscoe, B., and M. Menth, "Baseline
                    Encoding and Transport of Pre-Congestion
                    Information", RFC 5696, November 2009.

Notes
-----


Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5559 (draft-ietf-pcn-architecture-11)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) Architecture
Publication Date    : June 2009
Author(s)           : P. Eardley, Ed.
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Congestion and Pre-Congestion Notification
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG