[PCN] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-taylor-pcn-piggybacking-edge-behaviour-01]
Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net> Mon, 08 March 2010 01:34 UTC
Return-Path: <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
X-Original-To: pcn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECAC93A67ED for <pcn@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:34:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.496
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.496 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4jqT3FdHLJaG for <pcn@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:34:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc1-s3.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s3.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.14]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285ED3A67C2 for <pcn@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:34:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP33 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s3.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:34:13 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [74.12.183.53]
X-Originating-Email: [tom111.taylor@bell.net]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP338E0D0B51BCE9DDC07A93D8350@phx.gbl>
Received: from [192.168.2.11] ([74.12.183.53]) by BLU0-SMTP33.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:34:13 -0800
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:34:10 -0500
From: Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pcn <pcn@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Mar 2010 01:34:13.0655 (UTC) FILETIME=[7588CA70:01CABE5F]
Subject: [PCN] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-taylor-pcn-piggybacking-edge-behaviour-01]
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 01:34:11 -0000
I have pretty well rewritten the document. When I looked at draft-lefaucheur-rsvp-ecn-01.txt I almost considered bringing that up to date but keeping it basically the same. However, it gets into details of extensions to RSVP that are explicitly out of scope of PCN. I guess some day ... Anyway, if this draft has issues that are sufficiently interesting, I can ask for 15 minutes in Anaheim. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: New Version Notification for draft-taylor-pcn-piggybacking-edge-behaviour-01 Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:25:53 -0800 (PST) From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <idsubmission@ietf.org> To: tom111.taylor@bell.net A new version of I-D, draft-taylor-pcn-piggybacking-edge-behaviour-01.txt has been successfuly submitted by Tom Taylor and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-taylor-pcn-piggybacking-edge-behaviour Revision: 01 Title: The PCN Piggybacking Edge Behaviour Creation_date: 2010-03-08 WG ID: Independent Submission Number_of_pages: 7 Abstract: Precongestion notification (PCN) is a means for protecting quality of service for inelastic traffic admitted to a Diffserv domain. The overall PCN architecture is described in RFC 5559. This memo describes a behaviour for PCN egress nodes known as the "piggybacking" edge behaviour, because it "piggybacks" PCN information in resource signalling messages. This version of the memo describes two alternatives, where piggybacking is derived from the CL edge behaviour and where it is derived from the SM edge behaviour. The SM and CL edge behaviours are specified in companion documents. The IETF Secretariat.