Re: [PCN] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pcn-marking-behaviour-03.txt
Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com> Wed, 01 July 2009 19:28 UTC
Return-Path: <slblake@petri-meat.com>
X-Original-To: pcn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E78D3A6839 for <pcn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ktq1exAsDfzE for <pcn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elom.tchmachines.com (elom.tchmachines.com [208.76.80.198]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E17F3A696A for <pcn@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cpe-066-057-118-226.nc.res.rr.com ([66.57.118.226]) by elom.tchmachines.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <slblake@petri-meat.com>) id 1MM5Tn-0000nb-3B; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:28:27 -0400
From: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
To: "Black_David@emc.com" <Black_David@emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A03210F1F@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com>
References: <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A02FE0ACB@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com> <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A03210F1F@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:28:27 -0400
Message-Id: <1246476508.2990.7.camel@tachyon>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - elom.tchmachines.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - petri-meat.com
Cc: pcn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PCN] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pcn-marking-behaviour-03.txt
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:28:31 -0000
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 09:10 -0700, Black_David@emc.com wrote: > The -04 version of this draft resolves all of my comments > from the Gen-ART review of the -03 version. > > While it would be better to change the term "PCN-excess-rate" > to something else in a perfect world, the world is not > perfect - since that is now the established term for the > concept of a PCN configured rate above which all traffic is > excess, it should be left as is. Thanks David. // Steve
- Re: [PCN] [Gen-art] Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-p… Black_David
- [PCN] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pcn-marking-be… Black_David
- Re: [PCN] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pcn-markin… philip.eardley
- Re: [PCN] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pcn-markin… Michael Menth
- Re: [PCN] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pcn-markin… Black_David
- Re: [PCN] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pcn-markin… Steven Blake