[pcp] PCP for mobile phones

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com> Sun, 10 February 2013 02:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cheshire@apple.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A7021F8546 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 18:44:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.929, BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ELihR7II6L5q for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 18:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (bramley.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B55121F8558 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 18:44:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from relay14.apple.com ([17.128.113.52]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0MHZ00AJPGX800G1@mail-out.apple.com> for pcp@ietf.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:44:17 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11807134-b7f546d000005e2f-4e-511709810bba
Received: from kencur (kencur.apple.com [17.151.62.38]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (RC4-MD5/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 80.84.24111.18907115; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:44:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.15] (173-164-252-149-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.164.252.149]) by kencur.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0MHZ00CXXGXS5B50@kencur.apple.com> for pcp@ietf.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:44:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:44:16 -0800
To: PCP <pcp@ietf.org>
Message-id: <8CF7CBFA-0C33-49D3-94F6-8E186F79095C@apple.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpkluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRnG6nptvIKR5osLiR02Lysd+sDoweS5b8 ZApgjOKySUnNySxLLdK3S+DK+Hr5EXPBFfaKKw89GxgXsHUxcnJICJhItCxrYIawxSQu3FsP FhcSaGeSWNsb0MXIBWTvY5J43/ucCSTBJqAl8eLzFbAiZiB7/c7jTBC2tsSTdxdYQWwWAVWJ rfs2gA0VFpCT+LzuIVhcBGjB6scPwep5BWwkujpWsEDYhhJLrm9hhzhCVmLnndMsExh5ZyFZ MQvJillIWhYwMq9iFCxKzUmsNDTRSywoyEnVS87P3cQICpiGQpMdjAd/8h9iFOBgVOLhZXws FijEmlhWXJl7iFGCg1lJhHdvFlCINyWxsiq1KD++qDQntfgQozQHi5I475p44UAhgfTEktTs 1NSC1CKYLBMHp1QDo8he40lXCtt/lnzs+pO96taVl+9MWB5kGFixy7zd8NLNosFtnqf4jO9f etd6bbN+HznRNpBZLOSr6ObrZ7jrbxvvS2GtE5TZkubdW886KfHZ5V4x6YN7NRuVOKTuV3tF r/pzau67BTrZPIb1rbtrdPxWm2TVSEow+l9tnZvmK/muMvBvwXVhJZbijERDLeai4kQAFuLi pxQCAAA=
Subject: [pcp] PCP for mobile phones
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 02:44:35 -0000

I have submitted two Internet Drafts which propose the mechanisms necessary for Personal Hotspot software on a mobile telephone to use PCP.

PCP Anycast proposes how a mobile telephone can communicate with the upstream NAT gateway over 3GPP:

<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-cheshire-pcp-anycast-00.txt>

Of course some way of using PCP over 3GPP is necessary even in the simple case of a PCP client on the mobile telephone wanting to make basic PCP requests of its own.

If the mobile telephone also runs Personal Hotspot software making Wi-Fi Internet Access available to other local clients, then there will be typically two NATs involved: the Personal Hotspot NAT, and the mobile telephone carrier's NAT. In this case we need a way for the two NATs to cooperate to provide connectivity to the client devices. Recursive PCP proposes how this can be done:

<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-cheshire-recursive-pcp-00.txt>

Stuart Cheshire