Re: [pcp] The parity bit in PORT_SET
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Fri, 15 March 2013 07:16 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD25611E80A3 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.689
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.689 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.559, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t8nQVyiDP-iU for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA85B21F91AD for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm05.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.1]) by omfedm10.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id BDD66264449; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:16:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PUEXCH51.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.31]) by omfedm05.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id A427635C045; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:16:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.11]) by PUEXCH51.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.31]) with mapi; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:16:12 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Jean-Philippe Dionne <jean-philippe.dionne@viagenie.ca>, "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:16:11 +0100
Thread-Topic: [pcp] The parity bit in PORT_SET
Thread-Index: Ac4g9Jp/JwuPLbvLQ0+ZthLzu8CWMQAV9NBw
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EB7F296E3@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <51423670.80403@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <51423670.80403@viagenie.ca>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2013.3.15.64220
Subject: Re: [pcp] The parity bit in PORT_SET
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:16:15 -0000
Dear Jean-Philippe, It is not harmful to always set the bit to 1. The server can honor it or ignore it just like the suggested port set size. An application wanting this will insert also a PREFERE_FAILURE option. Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : pcp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pcp-bounces@ietf.org] De la >part de Jean-Philippe Dionne >Envoyé : jeudi 14 mars 2013 21:43 >À : pcp@ietf.org >Objet : [pcp] The parity bit in PORT_SET > >Hi, > >I do not think the parity bit is useful in the PORT_SET option. pcp >clients that will use PORT_SET and doesn't know if they need parity or >not, will simply always set this bit to 1. > >The parity bit can be removed from the PORT_SET option if we requires >the NAT to preserve mapping for any PCP request (or by being more >conservative, request with PORT_SET option only). > >Jean-Philippe >_______________________________________________ >pcp mailing list >pcp@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp >
- [pcp] The parity bit in PORT_SET Jean-Philippe Dionne
- Re: [pcp] The parity bit in PORT_SET mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [pcp] The parity bit in PORT_SET Jean-Philippe Dionne