Re: [pcp] #28: UPnP/NAT-PMP Interop functionality in base spec or separate specs
Paul Selkirk <pselkirk@isc.org> Fri, 25 February 2011 19:04 UTC
Return-Path: <pselkirk@isc.org>
X-Original-To: pcp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5FC3A66B4 for <pcp@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:04:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.124
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.124 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.323, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q-Q9+7cNYDTu for <pcp@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:04:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2BB3A69F5 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:04:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bikeshed.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK)) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B01A25F9863 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:04:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pselkirk@isc.org)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10300) id E5F4B216C22; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:04:42 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Selkirk <pselkirk@isc.org>
To: pcp@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:04:42 +0000
Message-ID: <s1vtyfs7x6d.fsf@bikeshed.isc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [pcp] #28: UPnP/NAT-PMP Interop functionality in base spec or separate specs
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:04:07 -0000
> As of -05, the UPnP interworking details were removed from the base > document. The bast document now points to http://tools.ietf.org/html > /draft-bpw-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking > > Closed. The UPnP IGD IWF document needs to be adopted as a WG document. I think the chairs can do this by fiat. There is no NAT-PMP IWF document. It should be easy to write, and Francis has volunteered to edit it. There should also be a PCP IWF (aka proxy in this case) document. (Note there are some open problems to implement one, so this is not only about completing the IWF document set.) paul