Re: [pcp] draft-chen-pcp-mobile-deployment-04

"Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com> Thu, 15 August 2013 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <tireddy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C98711E8165 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vq47Vxb8MXvI for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8614611E81E3 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=578; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1376582924; x=1377792524; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=mlvqfN2kl69Eb5LopLcch3htDhuEQ0ka5DaJB20O8tU=; b=E+/nqghYZ/0aJOdfTLCIPkoyuz0kwdaM5/NkM2XxBcWGKLV0dzaivgEA eWh/lXshU13a3JQxWPH/XaRkIxC6hJCQffLMz4d/06ZvpG2QcPrWiMXap +dJV8SyYZMOOJl7hq0U/BNDz3lje/e6ooD3sCwZhhbBMPmBrUsicPMQdM 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AowFALT8DFKtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABbgwaBBYJSvECBIRZ0giQBAQEDATpEBwQCAQgRBAEBCxQJBzIUCQgCBAESCIgCBrlwkB84BoMVdwOpNoMbgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,886,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="247730113"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Aug 2013 16:08:43 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7FG8hHh001557 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:08:43 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.191]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:08:43 -0500
From: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
To: Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@yegin.org>, "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [pcp] draft-chen-pcp-mobile-deployment-04
Thread-Index: AQHOmSB/3F0kWtX2802J7iT4q3jv2JmWKACg
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:08:43 +0000
Message-ID: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A1902003F@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
References: <2E25F372-58FF-482F-9210-5526953A08D0@yegin.org>
In-Reply-To: <2E25F372-58FF-482F-9210-5526953A08D0@yegin.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.65.64]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [pcp] draft-chen-pcp-mobile-deployment-04
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:08:53 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alper Yegin [mailto:alper.yegin@yegin.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 10:31 PM
> To: pcp@ietf.org
> Subject: [pcp] draft-chen-pcp-mobile-deployment-04
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Regarding the authentication considerations.... Wouldn't a 3GPP network be a
> candidate to use PCP w/o authentication ?

Can you provide more details why in 3GPP network PCP auth is not required ?

--Tiru.

> We could rely on lower-layer security as a substitute for PCP-layer security
> (much like what DHCP does).
> 
> Alper
>