Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: Optimizing NAT and Firewall Keepalives Using Port Control Protocol (PCP)

"Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com> Fri, 23 August 2013 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tireddy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5B511E82F1 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 05:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HzQlcw1drZ+x for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 05:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53E011E82FA for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 05:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1739; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1377260815; x=1378470415; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=+rXu4gv/TYVes1CgBsrkwbl2J9GBVPKdYt3n87Mfr7E=; b=fG8HRhAD7ZaAGO5DUrEIMRJPByZxefTxZmWsdAA0h4yHUmaa0J/mS7zs 9Tuj6Oik7xUqGzweEvKLUWkA7fTJIjYMy8TOVyy91lFJRhyCMs9l4JitY zujaNfVx+VN32wnUnk1haVloA2asJL0Hbx2TCIjU3OYy302p8eMtMYpeY s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0FAG5UF1KtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABagwc1Ub9+gR8WdIIkAQEBAwEdHTQXBAIBCBEEAQELFAULMh0IAgQBEgiIAgYMtnSPHYEYOAaDFXsDmROQLYFkgTuBcjk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,941,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="250893657"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Aug 2013 12:26:54 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7NCQsl0019137 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:26:54 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.8]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:26:53 -0500
From: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
To: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>, "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: Optimizing NAT and Firewall Keepalives Using Port Control Protocol (PCP)
Thread-Index: AQHOjFORrIMjf8sOSUiRMwszh5KQt5mixnpA
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:26:53 +0000
Message-ID: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A19030F64@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
References: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A1900F74A@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <E92E67B176B8B64D8D3A8F5E44E9D8F41EC91DC9@xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E92E67B176B8B64D8D3A8F5E44E9D8F41EC91DC9@xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.47.246]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: Optimizing NAT and Firewall Keepalives Using Port Control Protocol (PCP)
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:27:01 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 10:34 AM
> To: pcp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: Optimizing NAT and Firewall
> Keepalives Using Port Control Protocol (PCP)
> 
> I support adoption of this document.
> 
> One comment that you can take care in the next revision-
> We can add some text on how this document will interact with consent
> messages that would be sent for webRTC flows

Using PCP to increase the lifetime will be useful when not actively sending traffic i.e. when consent is not used. Planning to update draft "PCP Considerations for WebRTC Usage" http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-penno-rtcweb-pcp-00#section-3.6 with more details.

--Tiru.

> 
> Ram
> 
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Reinaldo Penno (repenno)
> >Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 3:52 PM
> >To: pcp@ietf.org
> >Subject: [pcp] WG Call for Adoption: Optimizing NAT and Firewall
> >Keepalives Using Port Control Protocol (PCP)
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >This email starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting "Optimizing NAT and
> >Firewall Keepalives Using Port Control Protocol (PCP)" as a WG item.
> >
> >     Title     : Optimizing NAT and Firewall Keepalives Using Port Control
> >Protocol (PCP)
> >     Author(s) : T. Reddy et al
> >     Filename  : draft-reddy-pcp-optimize-keepalives-01
> >     URL       :
> >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reddy-pcp-optimize-keepalives-01
> >
> >Please read the current revision and state you opinion either for or
> >against adoption in the mailing list.
> >
> >The call for adoption ends 12th August 2013.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Chairs
> >
> >
> >
> 
>