IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-08: (with DISCUSS)

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Thu, 09 July 2015 11:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA781A89B5; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 04:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SOaHFWCb6f1k; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 04:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias244.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1C621A89A5; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 04:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfeda05.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.198]) by omfeda13.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id F0FFA190E93; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 13:58:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.60]) by omfeda05.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id A2FF8180070; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 13:58:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM7F.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::c1d7:e278:e357:11ad%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 13:58:41 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [pcp] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-08: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHQujruVxY4OwVkKkKJEfJ1DYNYC53TBm8g
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 11:58:39 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933005359436@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <20150709113220.17494.888.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150709113220.17494.888.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.7.9.111516
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/KTdrX_XKdMMvkZ75Kk-XyjqASYc>
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-08: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 11:58:46 -0000

Hi Stephen, 

FWIW, the document does not include any discussion about authentication as per slide 4 of http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/slides/slides-87-pcp-2.pdf. Those aspects are out of scope of this document; implication assessment is supposed to be in the PCP auth draft. 

The answer to your question is in slide 3 (https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/slides/slides-87-pcp-6.pdf).

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : pcp [mailto:pcp-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Stephen Farrell
> Envoyé : jeudi 9 juillet 2015 13:32
> À : The IESG
> Cc : pcp@ietf.org
> Objet : [pcp] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-08: (with
> DISCUSS)
> 
> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-08: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pcp-proxy/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> I have one thing I'd like to check. Maybe this just works fine,
> but how does this function work with PCP authentication?  E.g.
> in Figure 1, is the left-most client authenticating to the
> middle or rightmost server? I think I could imagine either
> answer being desirable and don't see a way that both could be
> supported.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> pcp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email